CVE-2023-43804
ADVISORY - githubSummary
urllib3 doesn't treat the Cookie
HTTP header special or provide any helpers for managing cookies over HTTP, that is the responsibility of the user. However, it is possible for a user to specify a Cookie
header and unknowingly leak information via HTTP redirects to a different origin if that user doesn't disable redirects explicitly.
Users must handle redirects themselves instead of relying on urllib3's automatic redirects to achieve safe processing of the Cookie
header, thus we decided to strip the header by default in order to further protect users who aren't using the correct approach.
Affected usages
We believe the number of usages affected by this advisory is low. It requires all of the following to be true to be exploited:
- Using an affected version of urllib3 (patched in v1.26.17 and v2.0.6)
- Using the
Cookie
header on requests, which is mostly typical for impersonating a browser. - Not disabling HTTP redirects
- Either not using HTTPS or for the origin server to redirect to a malicious origin.
Remediation
- Upgrading to at least urllib3 v1.26.17 or v2.0.6
- Disabling HTTP redirects using
redirects=False
when sending requests. - Not using the
Cookie
header.
Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)
Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
GitHub
0.7
CVSS SCORE
7.4highPackage | Type | OS Name | OS Version | Affected Ranges | Fix Versions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
urllib3 | pypi | - | - | <1.26.17 | 1.26.17 |
urllib3 | pypi | - | - | >=2.0.0,<2.0.6 | 2.0.6 |
CVSS:4 Severity and metrics
The CVSS metrics represent different qualitative aspects of a vulnerability that impact the overall score, as defined by the CVSS Specification.
The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack, but the attack is limited at the protocol level to a logically adjacent topology. This can mean an attack must be launched from the same shared physical (e.g., Bluetooth or IEEE 802.11) or logical (e.g., local IP subnet) network, or from within a secure or otherwise limited administrative domain (e.g., MPLS, secure VPN to an administrative network zone). One example of an Adjacent attack would be an ARP (IPv4) or neighbor discovery (IPv6) flood leading to a denial of service on the local LAN segment (e.g., CVE-2013-6014).
Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component.
The successful attack depends on the presence of specific deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system that enable the attack. These include: A race condition must be won to successfully exploit the vulnerability. The successfulness of the attack is conditioned on execution conditions that are not under full control of the attacker. The attack may need to be launched multiple times against a single target before being successful. Network injection. The attacker must inject themselves into the logical network path between the target and the resource requested by the victim (e.g. vulnerabilities requiring an on-path attacker).
The attacker requires privileges that provide significant (e.g., administrative) control over the vulnerable system allowing full access to the vulnerable system's settings and files.
The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker. Examples include: a remote attacker is able to send packets to a target system a locally authenticated attacker executes code to elevate privileges.
There is a total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all information within the Vulnerable System being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact. For example, an attacker steals the administrator's password, or private encryption keys of a web server.
There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the Vulnerable System. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
NIST
0.7
CVSS SCORE
5.9mediumAlpine
-
Debian
-
Ubuntu
2.8
CVSS SCORE
8.1mediumAlma
-
CVSS SCORE
N/AmediumAlma
-
CVSS SCORE
N/AmediumAlma
-
CVSS SCORE
N/AmediumAlma
-
CVSS SCORE
N/AmediumAlma
-
CVSS SCORE
N/AmediumAlma
-
CVSS SCORE
N/AmediumAlma
-
CVSS SCORE
N/AmediumAlma
-
CVSS SCORE
N/AmediumAmazon
-
CVSS SCORE
N/AmediumRed Hat
0.7
CVSS SCORE
5.9mediumRocky
-
CVSS SCORE
N/AlowRocky
-
CVSS SCORE
N/AlowRocky
-
CVSS SCORE
N/AlowOracle
-
CVSS SCORE
N/AmediumOracle
-
CVSS SCORE
N/AmediumOracle
-
CVSS SCORE
N/AmediumOracle
-
CVSS SCORE
N/AmediumOracle
-
CVSS SCORE
N/AmediumOracle
-
CVSS SCORE
N/AmediumOracle
-
CVSS SCORE
N/AmediumOracle
-
CVSS SCORE
N/AmediumChainguard
CGA-56g7-689g-xp6r
-
Chainguard
CGA-7c9w-c64m-rwq2
-
Chainguard
CGA-f5jj-vcxx-v8m8
-
Chainguard
CGA-h89x-4j9m-pw85
-
Chainguard
CGA-hwhv-g3qw-gfgp
-
Chainguard
CGA-jj8v-vhq7-m6wh
-
Chainguard
CGA-mqx7-jxgh-vrfr
-
Photon
CVE-2023-43804
-