GHSA-9h6g-pr28-7cqp

SOURCE - github

Summary

### Summary A ReDoS vulnerability occurs when nodemailer tries to parse img files with the parameter attachDataUrls set, causing the stuck of event loop. Another flaw was found when nodemailer tries to parse an attachments with a embedded file, causing the stuck of event loop. ### Details Regex: /^data:((?:[^;];)(?:[^,])),(.)$/ Path: compile -> getAttachments -> _processDataUrl Regex: /(<img\b[^>]* src\s*=[\s"']*)(data:([^;]+);[^"'>\s]+)/ Path: _convertDataImages ### PoC https://gist.github.com/francoatmega/890dd5053375333e40c6fdbcc8c58df6 https://gist.github.com/francoatmega/9aab042b0b24968d7b7039818e8b2698 ### Impact ReDoS causes the event loop to stuck a specially crafted evil email can cause this problem.

Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)

SOURCE - github

Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity


github

CREATED


UPDATED



EXPLOITABILITY SCORE

3.9


EXPLOITS FOUND
-

COMMON WEAKNESS ENUMERATION (CWE)

CVSS SCORE

5.3medium
PackageTypeOS NameOS VersionAffected RangesFix Versions
nodemailernpm--<=6.9.86.9.9

CVSS:3 Severity and metrics

The CVSS metrics represent various qualitative aspects of a vulnerability that influence the overall score above.

The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack, but the attack is limited at the protocol level to a logically adjacent topology. This can mean an attack must be launched from the same shared physical (e.g., Bluetooth or IEEE 802.11) or logical (e.g., local IP subnet) network, or from within a secure or otherwise limited administrative domain (e.g., MPLS, secure VPN to an administrative network zone). One example of an Adjacent attack would be an ARP (IPv4) or neighbor discovery (IPv6) flood leading to a denial of service on the local LAN segment (e.g., CVE-2013-6014).

Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component.

The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.

The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user.

An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.

There is no loss of confidentiality.

There is no loss of trust or accuracy within the impacted component.

Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the impacted component are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.