CVE-2010-1622

ADVISORY - github

Summary

SpringSource Spring Framework 2.5.x before 2.5.6.SEC02, 2.5.7 before 2.5.7.SR01, and 3.0.x before 3.0.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via an HTTP request containing class.classLoader.URLs[0]=jar: followed by a URL of a crafted .jar file.

EPSS Score: 0.01856 (0.831)

Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)

ADVISORY - nist

Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')

ADVISORY - github

Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')

ADVISORY - gitlab

OWASP Top Ten 2017 Category A9 - Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')

OWASP Top Ten 2013 Category A9 - Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities

Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')

ADVISORY - redhat

Improper Neutralization of Directives in Statically Saved Code ('Static Code Injection')


GitLab

CREATED

UPDATED

ADVISORY ID

CVE-2010-1622

EXPLOITABILITY SCORE

6.8

EXPLOITS FOUND
-
COMMON WEAKNESS ENUMERATION (CWE)

CVSS SCORE

6medium
PackageTypeOS NameOS VersionAffected RangesFix Versions
org.springframework/spring-coremaven-->=2-alpha0,<=2.5.6.SEC012.5.6.SEC02, 3.0.3.RELEASE
org.springframework/spring-coremaven-->=3.0-alpha0,<=3.0.2.RELEASE2.5.6.SEC02, 3.0.3.RELEASE
org.springframework/springmaven-->=2.5.0,<=2.5.62.5.7, 3.0.3
org.springframework/springmaven-->=3.0.0,<=3.0.22.5.7, 3.0.3

CVSS:2 Severity and metrics

The CVSS metrics represent different qualitative aspects of a vulnerability that impact the overall score, as defined by the CVSS Specification.

The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack, but the attack is limited at the protocol level to a logically adjacent topology. This can mean an attack must be launched from the same shared physical (e.g., Bluetooth or IEEE 802.11) or logical (e.g., local IP subnet) network, or from within a secure or otherwise limited administrative domain (e.g., MPLS, secure VPN to an administrative network zone). One example of an Adjacent attack would be an ARP (IPv4) or neighbor discovery (IPv6) flood leading to a denial of service on the local LAN segment (e.g., CVE-2013-6014).

Access conditions are somewhat specialized for success. For example, some information gathering is needed, the attacker is limited to certain systems or users, or needs social engineering.

The vulnerability requires an attacker to be logged into the system (such as at a command line or via a desktop session or web interface).

There is considerable informational disclosure. Access to some system files is possible, but the attacker does not have control over what is obtained, or the scope of the loss is constrained. An example is a vulnerability that divulges only certain tables in a database.

Modification of some system files or information is possible, but the attacker does not have control over what can be modified, or the scope of what the attacker can affect is limited.

There is reduced performance or interruptions in resource availability. An example is a network-based flood attack that permits a limited number of successful connections to an Internet service.

NIST

CREATED

UPDATED

ADVISORY IDCVE-2010-1622
EXPLOITABILITY SCORE

6.8

EXPLOITS FOUND
COMMON WEAKNESS ENUMERATION (CWE)

CVSS SCORE

6medium

GitHub

CREATED

UPDATED

EXPLOITABILITY SCORE

-

EXPLOITS FOUND
-
COMMON WEAKNESS ENUMERATION (CWE)

CVSS SCORE

N/Amedium

Red Hat

CREATED

UPDATED

ADVISORY IDCVE-2010-1622
EXPLOITABILITY SCORE

10.0

EXPLOITS FOUND
-
COMMON WEAKNESS ENUMERATION (CWE)

CVSS SCORE

7.5high

intheWild

CREATED

UPDATED

ADVISORY IDCVE-2010-1622
EXPLOITABILITY SCORE

-

EXPLOITS FOUND

-

COMMON WEAKNESS ENUMERATION (CWE)-
RATING UNAVAILABLE FROM ADVISORY