CVE-2024-29034
ADVISORY - githubSummary
Impact
The vulnerability CVE-2023-49090 wasn't fully addressed.
This vulnerability is caused by the fact that when uploading to object storage, including Amazon S3, it is possible to set a Content-Type value that is interpreted by browsers to be different from what's allowed by content_type_allowlist, by providing multiple values separated by commas.
This bypassed value can be used to cause XSS.
Patches
Workarounds
Use the following monkey patch to let CarrierWave parse the Content-type by using Marcel::MimeType.for.
# For CarrierWave 3.x
CarrierWave::SanitizedFile.class_eval do
def declared_content_type
@declared_content_type ||
if @file.respond_to?(:content_type) && @file.content_type
Marcel::MimeType.for(declared_type: @file.content_type.to_s.chomp)
end
end
end
# For CarrierWave 2.x
CarrierWave::SanitizedFile.class_eval do
def existing_content_type
if @file.respond_to?(:content_type) && @file.content_type
Marcel::MimeType.for(declared_type: @file.content_type.to_s.chomp)
end
end
end
References
Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)
GitHub
CVSS SCORE
6.8medium| Package | Type | OS Name | OS Version | Affected Ranges | Fix Versions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| carrierwave | gem | - | - | <2.2.6 | 2.2.6 |
| carrierwave | gem | - | - | >=3.0.0,<3.0.7 | 3.0.7 |
CVSS:3 Severity and metrics
The CVSS metrics represent different qualitative aspects of a vulnerability that impact the overall score, as defined by the CVSS Specification.
The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack, but the attack is limited at the protocol level to a logically adjacent topology. This can mean an attack must be launched from the same shared physical (e.g., Bluetooth or IEEE 802.11) or logical (e.g., local IP subnet) network, or from within a secure or otherwise limited administrative domain (e.g., MPLS, secure VPN to an administrative network zone). One example of an Adjacent attack would be an ARP (IPv4) or neighbor discovery (IPv6) flood leading to a denial of service on the local LAN segment (e.g., CVE-2013-6014).
Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component.
The attacker requires privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a user to take some action before the vulnerability can be exploited. For example, a successful exploit may only be possible during the installation of an application by a system administrator.
An exploited vulnerability can affect resources beyond the security scope managed by the security authority of the vulnerable component. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are different and managed by different security authorities.
There is a total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact. For example, an attacker steals the administrator's password, or private encryption keys of a web server.
There is no loss of trust or accuracy within the impacted component.
There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.
NIST
CVSS SCORE
6.8mediumDebian
-
CVSS SCORE
N/AlowUbuntu
2.8
CVSS SCORE
6.1mediumChainguard
CGA-84c4-qjff-w432
-