CVE-2026-13676

ADVISORY - github

Summary

Impact

fast-uri versions >= 2.3.1, <= 4.0.0 fail to canonicalize Unicode/IDN hostnames for HTTP-family URLs. The IDN conversion path calls URL.domainToASCII(...) on the global WHATWG URL constructor, where that helper does not exist. The resulting TypeError is silently routed into parsed.error, but parse(), normalize(), and equal() all return with the host left in its original Unicode form.

For example, http://127。0。0。1/ is treated by fast-uri as host 127。0。0。1, while Node's WHATWG URL parser and fetch() canonicalize the same input to 127.0.0.1.

Applications that use fast-uri to enforce host-based policy (denylists, loopback filtering, redirect validation, outbound proxy routing) before passing the same URL into Node's URL or fetch() consumers see a policy/use desync and can be steered to an unintended destination.

Patches

Upgrade to fast-uri v4.0.1, v3.1.3, or v2.4.2

Workarounds

None. Upgrade to the patched version.

EPSS Score: 0.00369 (0.293)

Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)

ADVISORY - github

Interpretation Conflict

Incorrect Behavior Order: Authorization Before Parsing and Canonicalization

ADVISORY - redhat

Incorrect Behavior Order: Authorization Before Parsing and Canonicalization


GitHub

CREATED

UPDATED

EXPLOITABILITY SCORE

3.9

EXPLOITS FOUND
-
COMMON WEAKNESS ENUMERATION (CWE)

CVSS SCORE

7.5high
PackageTypeOS NameOS VersionAffected RangesFix Versions
fast-urinpm-->=3.0.0,<3.1.33.1.3
fast-urinpm-->=2.3.1,<2.4.22.4.2
fast-urinpm-->=4.0.0,<4.0.14.0.1

CVSS:3 Severity and metrics

The CVSS metrics represent different qualitative aspects of a vulnerability that impact the overall score, as defined by the CVSS Specification.

The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack, but the attack is limited at the protocol level to a logically adjacent topology. This can mean an attack must be launched from the same shared physical (e.g., Bluetooth or IEEE 802.11) or logical (e.g., local IP subnet) network, or from within a secure or otherwise limited administrative domain (e.g., MPLS, secure VPN to an administrative network zone). One example of an Adjacent attack would be an ARP (IPv4) or neighbor discovery (IPv6) flood leading to a denial of service on the local LAN segment (e.g., CVE-2013-6014).

Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component.

The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.

The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user.

An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.

There is no loss of confidentiality.

There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any or all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.

There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Debian

CREATED

UPDATED

EXPLOITABILITY SCORE

-

EXPLOITS FOUND
-
COMMON WEAKNESS ENUMERATION (CWE)-

CVSS SCORE

N/Alow

Ubuntu

CREATED

UPDATED

EXPLOITABILITY SCORE

-

EXPLOITS FOUND
-
COMMON WEAKNESS ENUMERATION (CWE)-

CVSS SCORE

N/Amedium

Red Hat

CREATED

UPDATED

EXPLOITABILITY SCORE

3.9

EXPLOITS FOUND
-
COMMON WEAKNESS ENUMERATION (CWE)

CVSS SCORE

7.5high