CVE-2026-34785
ADVISORY - githubSummary
Summary
Rack::Static determines whether a request should be served as a static file using a simple string prefix check. When configured with URL prefixes such as "/css", it matches any request path that begins with that string, including unrelated paths such as "/css-config.env" or "/css-backup.sql".
As a result, files under the static root whose names merely share the configured prefix may be served unintentionally, leading to information disclosure.
Details
Rack::Static#route_file performs static-route matching using logic equivalent to:
@urls.any? { |url| path.index(url) == 0 }
This checks only whether the request path starts with the configured prefix string. It does not require a path segment boundary after the prefix.
For example, with:
use Rack::Static, urls: ["/css", "/js"], root: "public"
the following path is matched as intended:
/css/style.css
but these paths are also matched:
/css-config.env
/css-backup.sql
/csssecrets.yml
If such files exist under the configured static root, Rack forwards the request to the file server and serves them as static content.
This means a configuration intended to expose only directory trees such as /css/... and /js/... may also expose sibling files whose names begin with those same strings.
Impact
An attacker can request files under the configured static root whose names share a configured URL prefix and obtain their contents.
In affected deployments, this may expose configuration files, secrets, backups, environment files, or other unintended static content located under the same root directory.
Mitigation
- Update to a patched version of Rack that enforces a path boundary when matching configured static URL prefixes.
- Match only paths that are either exactly equal to the configured prefix or begin with
prefix + "/". - Avoid placing sensitive files under the
Rack::Staticroot directory. - Prefer static URL mappings that cannot overlap with sensitive filenames.
Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)
Files or Directories Accessible to External Parties
GitHub
CVSS SCORE
7.5high| Package | Type | OS Name | OS Version | Affected Ranges | Fix Versions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rack | gem | - | - | >=3.2.0,<3.2.6 | 3.2.6 |
| rack | gem | - | - | <2.2.23 | 2.2.23 |
| rack | gem | - | - | >=3.0.0.beta1,<3.1.21 | 3.1.21 |
CVSS:3 Severity and metrics
The CVSS metrics represent different qualitative aspects of a vulnerability that impact the overall score, as defined by the CVSS Specification.
The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack, but the attack is limited at the protocol level to a logically adjacent topology. This can mean an attack must be launched from the same shared physical (e.g., Bluetooth or IEEE 802.11) or logical (e.g., local IP subnet) network, or from within a secure or otherwise limited administrative domain (e.g., MPLS, secure VPN to an administrative network zone). One example of an Adjacent attack would be an ARP (IPv4) or neighbor discovery (IPv6) flood leading to a denial of service on the local LAN segment (e.g., CVE-2013-6014).
Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component.
The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user.
An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
There is a total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact. For example, an attacker steals the administrator's password, or private encryption keys of a web server.
There is no loss of trust or accuracy within the impacted component.
There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.
NIST
CVSS SCORE
7.5highDebian
-
Ubuntu
-
CVSS SCORE
N/AmediumRed Hat
3.9
CVSS SCORE
7.5highminimos
MINI-2vpc-fx7j-9jqx
-
minimos
MINI-3vmh-r8r5-pgpr
-
minimos
MINI-f8mp-wjfc-756j
-
minimos
MINI-j9cm-q584-74qq
-
minimos
MINI-m2wc-jj53-w9r6
-
minimos
MINI-mh4f-8cq4-pcpq
-
minimos
MINI-mr7p-6c95-vgc7
-
minimos
MINI-p748-mmxh-732p
-
minimos
MINI-r7wv-frgv-5gff
-
minimos
MINI-rh8f-g7cq-5p7v
-
minimos
MINI-rxcv-rghv-6wr2
-
minimos
MINI-vcr2-h3v6-c7fj
-
minimos
MINI-wq6p-5vv9-99ww
-
minimos
MINI-xm5q-8273-g3xw
-