CVE-2026-44646

ADVISORY - github

Summary

Summary

Context.spawn() in liquidjs creates a child Context for the {% render %} tag but does not propagate the parent context's resolved ownPropertyOnly value. The new context re-derives ownPropertyOnly from opts.ownPropertyOnly (the instance-level option), silently discarding any RenderOptions.ownPropertyOnly override that was supplied to parseAndRender(). As a result, a developer who runs a Liquid instance with the backwards-compatible ownPropertyOnly:false and then locks down an untrusted render with parseAndRender(..., { ownPropertyOnly: true }) still leaks prototype-chain properties from inside any {% render %} partial. This is a distinct exploit surface from the previously identified array-filter variants (where, reject, group_by, find, find_index, has) — the underlying root cause in Context.spawn() is shared, but {% render %} is a separately reachable sink that needs no filter usage.

Details

The bug is in Context.spawn():

// src/context/context.ts:105-114
public spawn (scope = {}) {
  return new Context(scope, this.opts, {
    sync: this.sync,
    globals: this.globals,
    strictVariables: this.strictVariables
    // <-- ownPropertyOnly is missing here
  }, {
    renderLimit: this.renderLimit,
    memoryLimit: this.memoryLimit
  })
}

The constructor resolves ownPropertyOnly as:

// src/context/context.ts:47
this.ownPropertyOnly = renderOptions.ownPropertyOnly ?? opts.ownPropertyOnly

Because spawn() passes a RenderOptions object with no ownPropertyOnly, the child context falls back to opts.ownPropertyOnly (the instance-level option), throwing away any per-render override that the parent context had applied. this.opts is the raw normalized instance options object; it is not mutated to reflect render-time overrides.

The {% render %} tag at src/tags/render.ts:51-77 calls spawn() to build the partial's isolated scope:

* render (ctx: Context, emitter: Emitter): Generator<unknown, void, unknown> {
  const { liquid, hash } = this
  const filepath = (yield renderFilePath(this['file'], ctx, liquid)) as string
  assert(filepath, () => `illegal file path "${filepath}"`)

  const childCtx = ctx.spawn()                    // <-- ownPropertyOnly lost here
  const scope = childCtx.bottom()
  __assign(scope, yield hash.render(ctx))
  ...
  const templates = (yield liquid._parsePartialFile(filepath, childCtx.sync, this['currentFile'])) as Template[]
  yield liquid.renderer.renderTemplates(templates, childCtx, emitter)
}

All template variable lookups inside the partial then go through childCtx.readProperty() (src/context/context.ts:123-135), which calls readJSProperty(obj, key, this.ownPropertyOnly). With childCtx.ownPropertyOnly === false (inherited from opts), the protective check at src/context/context.ts:138-141 is skipped and prototype-chain properties are returned to the template:

export function readJSProperty (obj: Scope, key: PropertyKey, ownPropertyOnly: boolean) {
  if (ownPropertyOnly && !hasOwnProperty.call(obj, key) && !(obj instanceof Drop)) return undefined
  return obj[key]
}

The {% include %} tag is not affected: it does not call spawn(); it pushes onto the parent context's scope stack (src/tags/include.ts:40), so the parent's resolved ownPropertyOnly continues to apply.

Trust model / why this matters: RenderOptions.ownPropertyOnly is documented (src/liquid-options.ts:108-111) as "Same as ownPropertyOnly on LiquidOptions, but only for current render() call". It exists precisely so that developers running a non-strict instance can lock down individual untrusted renders. That contract is broken — the override is silently dropped at every partial boundary.

PoC

mkdir -p /tmp/render-poc
printf '{{ user.passwordHash }}' > /tmp/render-poc/_user.liquid

node -e "
const { Liquid } = require('./dist/liquid.node.js');
const liquid = new Liquid({ ownPropertyOnly: false, root: '/tmp/render-poc' });

class User { constructor(n){ this.name = n; } }
User.prototype.passwordHash = 'bcrypt\$secret';
const u = new User('alice');

liquid.parseAndRender(
  'Direct:[{{ user.passwordHash }}] Render:[{% render \"_user.liquid\", user: user %}]',
  { user: u },
  { ownPropertyOnly: true }
).then(console.log);
"

Verified output on liquidjs 10.25.7:

Direct:[] Render:[bcrypt$secret]

The top-level expression {{ user.passwordHash }} is correctly blocked by the per-render ownPropertyOnly:true, but the same expression inside the partial loaded by {% render %} returns the prototype-chain property — proof that Context.spawn() discarded the override.

Impact

  • Information disclosure: Any prototype-chain property of objects passed into a {% render %} partial — including secrets, hashes, internal state, framework-injected helpers — becomes readable from inside the partial template, even when the developer used the documented per-render lockdown.
  • Realistic threat model: Applications that maintain ownPropertyOnly:false for backwards compatibility (or because their data layer relies on prototype methods) and lock down untrusted-template renders with parseAndRender(..., { ownPropertyOnly:true }) are protected at the top level but silently exposed inside any partial. User-controllable template content (CMS snippets, theme partials, email templates) that uses {% render %} becomes an info-leak primitive.
  • Distinct from existing CVE-2022-25948: the prior advisory only covered direct use of ownPropertyOnly:false; this is a failure of the documented mitigation (ownPropertyOnly:true per-render override), not a missing setting.
  • Distinct from the array-filter variant: same spawn() root cause, but exploitable without invoking where/reject/group_by/find/find_index/has — only requires that the template uses {% render %} (a basic templating feature) and that one of the rendered values has prototype-chain properties.

Recommended Fix

Propagate ownPropertyOnly (and any other security-relevant render options) inside Context.spawn():

// src/context/context.ts
public spawn (scope = {}) {
  return new Context(scope, this.opts, {
    sync: this.sync,
    globals: this.globals,
    strictVariables: this.strictVariables,
    ownPropertyOnly: this.ownPropertyOnly   // <-- propagate resolved per-render value
  }, {
    renderLimit: this.renderLimit,
    memoryLimit: this.memoryLimit
  })
}

Passing this.ownPropertyOnly (the resolved value, not this.opts.ownPropertyOnly) ensures any RenderOptions.ownPropertyOnly override flows into spawned child contexts. This single change closes both the {% render %} pathway documented here and the array-filter pathway tracked separately. A regression test should assert that a partial rendered via {% render %} honours parseAndRender(..., { ownPropertyOnly: true }) against an object with prototype-chain properties.

Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)

ADVISORY - github

Protection Mechanism Failure


GitHub

CREATED

UPDATED

EXPLOITABILITY SCORE

3.9

EXPLOITS FOUND
-
COMMON WEAKNESS ENUMERATION (CWE)

CVSS SCORE

5.3medium
PackageTypeOS NameOS VersionAffected RangesFix Versions
liquidjsnpm--<=10.25.7Not yet available

CVSS:3 Severity and metrics

The CVSS metrics represent different qualitative aspects of a vulnerability that impact the overall score, as defined by the CVSS Specification.

The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack, but the attack is limited at the protocol level to a logically adjacent topology. This can mean an attack must be launched from the same shared physical (e.g., Bluetooth or IEEE 802.11) or logical (e.g., local IP subnet) network, or from within a secure or otherwise limited administrative domain (e.g., MPLS, secure VPN to an administrative network zone). One example of an Adjacent attack would be an ARP (IPv4) or neighbor discovery (IPv6) flood leading to a denial of service on the local LAN segment (e.g., CVE-2013-6014).

Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component.

The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.

The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user.

An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.

There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.

There is no loss of trust or accuracy within the impacted component.

There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.