CVE-2026-45045

ADVISORY - github

Summary

Summary

The BalancerForward proxy helper in GoFiber uses Header.Add() instead of Header.Set() when injecting the X-Real-IP header. This appends the real client IP as a second header value rather than replacing any attacker-supplied value. Upstream servers that read the first X-Real-IP header (nginx, Express, most HTTP servers) use the attacker's spoofed IP for logging, rate limiting, and access control.

Vulnerable Code

File: middleware/proxy/proxy.go, lines 270-285

func BalancerForward(servers []string, clients ...*fasthttp.Client) fiber.Handler {
    r := &roundrobin{
        current: 0,
        pool:    servers,
    }
    return func(c fiber.Ctx) error {
        server := r.get()
        if !strings.HasPrefix(server, "http") {
            server = "http://" + server
        }
        c.Request().Header.Add("X-Real-IP", c.IP())   // line 282: Add, not Set
        return Do(c, server+c.OriginalURL(), clients...)
    }
}

Data Flow

  1. Attacker sends request with X-Real-IP: 10.0.0.1 (spoofed internal IP)
  2. BalancerForward handler executes at line 282
  3. c.Request().Header.Add("X-Real-IP", c.IP()) APPENDS the real IP as a second header
  4. Upstream server receives: X-Real-IP: 10.0.0.1 AND X-Real-IP: <real-attacker-ip>
  5. Most HTTP servers (nginx, Node.js, Apache) read the FIRST value
  6. Upstream uses 10.0.0.1 for all IP-dependent logic

Impact

  • Rate limit bypass: IP-based rate limiting at the upstream uses the spoofed IP, allowing unlimited requests
  • IP ACL bypass: Internal IP allowlists (e.g., admin panels restricted to 10.0.0.0/8) can be bypassed
  • Audit log poisoning: Security logs record the spoofed IP, making incident investigation unreliable
  • Geolocation bypass: IP-based geofencing or region restrictions are circumvented

Fix

Replace Header.Add() with Header.Set() at line 282:

c.Request().Header.Set("X-Real-IP", c.IP())

Header.Set() replaces any existing header value, ensuring only the real client IP is forwarded.

EPSS Score: 0.00363 (0.295)

Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)

ADVISORY - github

Authentication Bypass by Spoofing


GitHub

CREATED

UPDATED

EXPLOITABILITY SCORE

3.9

EXPLOITS FOUND
-
COMMON WEAKNESS ENUMERATION (CWE)

CVSS SCORE

5.3medium
PackageTypeOS NameOS VersionAffected RangesFix Versions
github.com/gofiber/fiber/v2golang--<=2.52.132.52.14
github.com/gofiber/fiber/v2golang--<0.0.0-20260706061843-a74500f6335a0.0.0-20260706061843-a74500f6335a
github.com/gofiber/fiber/v3golang--<=3.2.03.3.0
github.com/gofiber/fiber/v3golang--<0.0.0-20260522065330-a39a035dee6d0.0.0-20260522065330-a39a035dee6d

CVSS:3 Severity and metrics

The CVSS metrics represent different qualitative aspects of a vulnerability that impact the overall score, as defined by the CVSS Specification.

The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack, but the attack is limited at the protocol level to a logically adjacent topology. This can mean an attack must be launched from the same shared physical (e.g., Bluetooth or IEEE 802.11) or logical (e.g., local IP subnet) network, or from within a secure or otherwise limited administrative domain (e.g., MPLS, secure VPN to an administrative network zone). One example of an Adjacent attack would be an ARP (IPv4) or neighbor discovery (IPv6) flood leading to a denial of service on the local LAN segment (e.g., CVE-2013-6014).

Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component.

The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.

The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user.

An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.

There is no loss of confidentiality.

Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact on the impacted component.

There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Ubuntu

CREATED

UPDATED

EXPLOITABILITY SCORE

-

EXPLOITS FOUND
-
COMMON WEAKNESS ENUMERATION (CWE)-

CVSS SCORE

N/Amedium

GoLang

CREATED

UPDATED

ADVISORY IDGO-2026-5887
EXPLOITABILITY SCORE

-

EXPLOITS FOUND
-
COMMON WEAKNESS ENUMERATION (CWE)-
RATING UNAVAILABLE FROM ADVISORY

Chainguard

CREATED

UPDATED

ADVISORY ID

CGA-rh8r-f3g3-pxfx

EXPLOITABILITY SCORE

-

EXPLOITS FOUND
-
COMMON WEAKNESS ENUMERATION (CWE)-
RATING UNAVAILABLE FROM ADVISORY

minimos

CREATED

UPDATED

ADVISORY ID

MINI-5g7v-9g4p-6349

EXPLOITABILITY SCORE

-

EXPLOITS FOUND
-
COMMON WEAKNESS ENUMERATION (CWE)-
RATING UNAVAILABLE FROM ADVISORY

minimos

CREATED

UPDATED

ADVISORY ID

MINI-6r5m-9fvh-3mx8

EXPLOITABILITY SCORE

-

EXPLOITS FOUND
-
COMMON WEAKNESS ENUMERATION (CWE)-
RATING UNAVAILABLE FROM ADVISORY

minimos

CREATED

UPDATED

ADVISORY ID

MINI-7w8h-jr24-h956

EXPLOITABILITY SCORE

-

EXPLOITS FOUND
-
COMMON WEAKNESS ENUMERATION (CWE)-
RATING UNAVAILABLE FROM ADVISORY

minimos

CREATED

UPDATED

ADVISORY ID

MINI-8vvp-fqcg-3cqh

EXPLOITABILITY SCORE

-

EXPLOITS FOUND
-
COMMON WEAKNESS ENUMERATION (CWE)-
RATING UNAVAILABLE FROM ADVISORY