CVE-2026-47261
ADVISORY - githubSummary
Summary
In wasmtime-wasi, when a filesystem preopen is given DirPerms::all() and FilePerms::READ without FilePerms::WRITE, this wasmtime-wasi enforced access control mechanism can be bypassed by using the wasip2 descriptor.open-at or wasip1 path_open interfaces by opening a file with OpenFlags::TRUNCATE oflag only, for example:
dir_descriptor.open_at(
PathFlags::empty(),
FILENAME,
OpenFlags::TRUNCATE,
DescriptorFlags::READ,
)
wasip1::path_open(
dir_fd,
0,
FILENAME,
wasip1::OFLAGS_TRUNC,
wasip1::RIGHTS_FD_READ,
0,
0
)
The root cause is that the clause that considered OpenFlags::TRUNCATE did not set open_mode |= OpenMode::WRITE;, used later in that function for the access control check against FilePerms for whether opening that file is permitted. With the bug corrected, these calls to open-at and path_open fail with error-code.not-permitted and ERRNO_PERM respectively.
The bug in crates/wasi/src/filesystem.rs, Dir::open_at, lines 967–969:
if oflags.contains(OpenFlags::TRUNCATE) {
opts.truncate(true).write(true);
}
and the single line fix is:
if oflags.contains(OpenFlags::TRUNCATE) {
opts.truncate(true).write(true);
open_mode |= OpenMode::WRITE;
}
Only wasmtime-wasi embeddings that use a combination of DirPerms::MUTATE with FilePerms::READ are affected by this bug, e.g. those that use in the WasiCtxBuilder:
builder.preopened_dir("readonly", "readonly", DirPerms::READ | DirPerms::MUTATE, FilePerms::READ);
In particular, the Wasmtime project's wasmtime-cli's use of wasmtime-wasi is not affected, because it always sets FilePerms::all() for all preopens.
Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)
Improper Access Control
Improper Access Control
GitHub
3.9
CVSS SCORE
7.5high| Package | Type | OS Name | OS Version | Affected Ranges | Fix Versions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| wasmtime-wasi | cargo | - | - | >=37.0.0,<44.0.2 | 44.0.2 |
| wasmtime-wasi | cargo | - | - | <24.0.9 | 24.0.9 |
| wasmtime-wasi | cargo | - | - | >=25.0.0,<36.0.10 | 36.0.10 |
CVSS:3 Severity and metrics
The CVSS metrics represent different qualitative aspects of a vulnerability that impact the overall score, as defined by the CVSS Specification.
The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack, but the attack is limited at the protocol level to a logically adjacent topology. This can mean an attack must be launched from the same shared physical (e.g., Bluetooth or IEEE 802.11) or logical (e.g., local IP subnet) network, or from within a secure or otherwise limited administrative domain (e.g., MPLS, secure VPN to an administrative network zone). One example of an Adjacent attack would be an ARP (IPv4) or neighbor discovery (IPv6) flood leading to a denial of service on the local LAN segment (e.g., CVE-2013-6014).
Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component.
The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user.
An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
There is no loss of confidentiality.
There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any or all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.
There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.
NIST
3.9
CVSS SCORE
7.5highAlpine
-
Debian
-
Ubuntu
-
CVSS SCORE
N/AmediumChainguard
CGA-8jmw-f257-fj7m
-