CVE-2026-54275
ADVISORY - githubSummary
Summary
The server_hostname TLS SNI check can be bypassed when an existing connection is reused.
Impact
If an application makes multiple requests to the same domain, but with different per-request server_hostname parameters, then the later calls may succeed by reusing the existing connection when they should have been rejected due to the TLS SNI check.
Workaround
Disable keep_alive if you need to change the server_hostname check between requests.
Patch: https://github.com/aio-libs/aiohttp/commit/0ca2b6c28a25726527a8b60f25960262a91ed0e0
Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)
Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch
GitHub
-
CVSS SCORE
2.7low| Package | Type | OS Name | OS Version | Affected Ranges | Fix Versions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| aiohttp | pypi | - | - | <=3.14.0 | 3.14.1 |
CVSS:4 Severity and metrics
The CVSS metrics represent different qualitative aspects of a vulnerability that impact the overall score, as defined by the CVSS Specification.
The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack, but the attack is limited at the protocol level to a logically adjacent topology. This can mean an attack must be launched from the same shared physical (e.g., Bluetooth or IEEE 802.11) or logical (e.g., local IP subnet) network, or from within a secure or otherwise limited administrative domain (e.g., MPLS, secure VPN to an administrative network zone). One example of an Adjacent attack would be an ARP (IPv4) or neighbor discovery (IPv6) flood leading to a denial of service on the local LAN segment (e.g., CVE-2013-6014).
Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component.
The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
The attacker is unauthenticated prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker. Examples include: a remote attacker is able to send packets to a target system a locally authenticated attacker executes code to elevate privileges.
There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Chainguard
CGA-7rc4-cr5c-mxf4
-
minimos
MINI-4m8q-c56p-c9hh
-
minimos
MINI-68wj-9j26-jj3p
-
minimos
MINI-965g-fvcf-wjpf
-
minimos
MINI-h8xp-99c5-73h3
-
minimos
MINI-q73m-f7mw-f4m4
-
minimos
MINI-rr9q-pqxg-m44c
-
minimos
MINI-v725-8rv2-6h7p
-
minimos
MINI-v9rg-6gw8-759q
-