CVE-2026-59877
ADVISORY - githubSummary
Summary
protobufjs parsed option names by advancing through schema tokens until it reached an = token, without checking for end of input. A crafted .proto schema that opens an option declaration but ends prematurely could cause the option parser to loop without ever terminating.
This affects the reflection parsing path (parse, Root.load, Root.loadSync).
Impact
An attacker who can provide or influence .proto schema text parsed by an application may be able to cause the parsing call to never return. Because Node.js is single-threaded, the blocked event loop prevents all other work in the process, resulting in a denial of service that persists until the process is externally terminated.
Applications that only encode or decode protobuf binary data with trusted schemas are not directly affected.
Preconditions
- The application must parse
.protoschema text influenced by an attacker. - The schema must be parsed through APIs such as
parse,Root.load, orRoot.loadSync. - The crafted input must begin an option declaration that ends before its
=assignment.
Workarounds
Do not parse .proto schemas from untrusted sources with affected versions. If untrusted schema text must be accepted, isolate parsing in a process or worker that can be safely terminated and bound it with a timeout, so a non-returning parse call cannot deny service to the rest of the application.
Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)
Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop')
GitHub
3.9
CVSS SCORE
5.3medium| Package | Type | OS Name | OS Version | Affected Ranges | Fix Versions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| protobufjs | npm | - | - | >=8.0.0,<=8.6.5 | 8.6.6 |
| protobufjs | npm | - | - | >=7.5.0,<=7.6.4 | 7.6.5 |
CVSS:3 Severity and metrics
The CVSS metrics represent different qualitative aspects of a vulnerability that impact the overall score, as defined by the CVSS Specification.
The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack, but the attack is limited at the protocol level to a logically adjacent topology. This can mean an attack must be launched from the same shared physical (e.g., Bluetooth or IEEE 802.11) or logical (e.g., local IP subnet) network, or from within a secure or otherwise limited administrative domain (e.g., MPLS, secure VPN to an administrative network zone). One example of an Adjacent attack would be an ARP (IPv4) or neighbor discovery (IPv6) flood leading to a denial of service on the local LAN segment (e.g., CVE-2013-6014).
Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component.
The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user.
An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
There is no loss of confidentiality.
There is no loss of trust or accuracy within the impacted component.
Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the impacted component are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.