CVE-2026-59887
ADVISORY - githubSummary
Summary
linkify-it's schema-scan loop (.test() / .match(), the documented public API) invokes the mailto:
schema validator at every mailto: occurrence in the input text. For each occurrence the validator does
text.slice(pos) (an O(n) copy) and runs an email regex whose local-part class src_email_name greedily
scans the entire remaining tail (O(n)) before failing. With N mailto: occurrences that is
N × O(n) = O(n²). Because linkify-it runs on arbitrary user text (markdown-it feeds it whole documents
when linkify:true), an unauthenticated attacker can block the single-threaded event loop for many seconds
with a small input. No length bound (unlike an HTTP header).
Root cause — index.mjs + lib/re.mjs
// index.mjs (mailto validator) — runs at every "mailto:" hit
'mailto:': { validate: function (text, pos, self) {
const tail = text.slice(pos) // O(n) copy per hit
if (!self.re.mailto) self.re.mailto = new RegExp('^' + self.re.src_email_name + '@' + self.re.src_host_strict, 'i')
if (self.re.mailto.test(tail)) { ... } // scans the whole O(n) tail
return 0
}}
// lib/re.mjs:91-93 — every char of "mailto:" (incl. ':','-',';') is in this class:
re.src_email_name = '[\\-;:&=\\+\\$,\\.a-zA-Z0-9_][\\-;:&=\\+\\$,\\"\\.a-zA-Z0-9_]*'
The while ((m = re.exec(text)) !== null) { …testSchemaAt… } scan loop calls the validator at each
mailto: hit; src_email_name greedily consumes the whole tail (all chars are in its class) then fails for
lack of @. http:/https: do NOT blow up — their validator requires the tail to start with //, failing
in O(1) per hit.
Proof of Concept (confirmed, linkify-it 5.0.1, Node v24)
const LinkifyIt = require('linkify-it');
const lf = new LinkifyIt();
lf.match('mailto:'.repeat(48000)); // ~336 KB of "mailto:mailto:…" -> seconds of blocked event loop
| input (same bytes) | 56 KB | 112 KB | 224 KB | 336 KB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
mailto: contiguous |
97 ms | 357 ms | 1438 ms | 3272 ms |
mailto: space-separated |
2 ms | 3 ms | 5 ms | 8 ms |
http:// contiguous |
12 ms | 17 ms | 33 ms | 49 ms |
×~4 per 2× input ⇒ O(n²); equal-byte controls stay flat ⇒ algorithmic, not a GC/allocation artifact.
Real-world via markdown-it 14.x ({linkify:true}), md.render('mailto:'.repeat(n)): 219 KB ≈ ~5 s.
Impact
Reachable on arbitrary user text via the documented .test()/.match() API and through markdown-it's
linkifier — comment systems, chat, forums, wikis, note apps that render user markdown with linkify enabled.
A ~220 KB post hangs the event loop ~5 s; a few hundred KB → tens of seconds. Availability only.
Suggested remediation
Bound the email local-part per RFC 5321 (≤64) so per-hit work is O(1), and avoid the full-tail slice:
// lib/re.mjs — cap the greedy run:
re.src_email_name = '[\\-;:&=\\+\\$,\\.a-zA-Z0-9_][\\-;:&=\\+\\$,\\"\\.a-zA-Z0-9_]{0,63}'
// index.mjs — prefer a sticky regex anchored at `pos` over text.slice(pos).
Affected / disclosure
All versions through 5.0.1 (latest); same code on master. cve-mcp/OSV report no known vulnerability for
linkify-it. Distinct from markdown-it's own *-run ReDoS (CVE-2026-2327, different package/path) and the
recent markdown-it DoS. Reported privately; happy to test a patch against the PoC.
Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)
Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity
GitHub
3.9
CVSS SCORE
7.5high| Package | Type | OS Name | OS Version | Affected Ranges | Fix Versions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| linkify-it | npm | - | - | <=5.0.1 | 5.0.2 |
CVSS:3 Severity and metrics
The CVSS metrics represent different qualitative aspects of a vulnerability that impact the overall score, as defined by the CVSS Specification.
The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack, but the attack is limited at the protocol level to a logically adjacent topology. This can mean an attack must be launched from the same shared physical (e.g., Bluetooth or IEEE 802.11) or logical (e.g., local IP subnet) network, or from within a secure or otherwise limited administrative domain (e.g., MPLS, secure VPN to an administrative network zone). One example of an Adjacent attack would be an ARP (IPv4) or neighbor discovery (IPv6) flood leading to a denial of service on the local LAN segment (e.g., CVE-2013-6014).
Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component.
The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user.
An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
There is no loss of confidentiality.
There is no loss of trust or accuracy within the impacted component.
There is a total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.