CVE-2026-76172
ADVISORY - githubSummary
Impact
fast-uri decodes percent-encoded characters in the scheme component with the legacy global unescape() and serializes the result back as raw characters, without re-escaping it or validating it as a scheme. A scheme that decodes to characters outside the RFC 3986 scheme grammar can therefore introduce structure the original input did not contain.
For example, %2f%2fevil.example:/pwn parses with no authority (parse().host is undefined), but resolve() and normalize() return //evil.example:/pwn, which reparses with host evil.example. The %uXXXX form (%u002f%u002fevil.example:/pwn) produces the same result, and a scheme containing %0d%0a reaches the output as a raw CR LF.
Applications that normalize or resolve untrusted URLs before a redirect check, host allowlist, or outbound request decision, especially ones that treat a missing authority as same-origin, can be steered to an attacker-chosen authority, and a normalized URI placed in a response header can carry an injected CR LF.
Patches
Upgrade to fast-uri >= 4.1.3, or >= 3.1.6 in the v3.x release line, or >= 2.4.5 in the v2.x release line.
Workarounds
None. Upgrade to the patched version.
Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)
Improper Handling of URL Encoding (Hex Encoding)
Improper Handling of URL Encoding (Hex Encoding)
GitHub
3.9
CVSS SCORE
7.5high| Package | Type | OS Name | OS Version | Affected Ranges | Fix Versions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| fast-uri | npm | - | - | >=3.0.0,<3.1.6 | 3.1.6 |
| fast-uri | npm | - | - | >=2.3.1,<2.4.5 | 2.4.5 |
| fast-uri | npm | - | - | >=4.0.0,<4.1.3 | 4.1.3 |
CVSS:3 Severity and metrics
The CVSS metrics represent different qualitative aspects of a vulnerability that impact the overall score, as defined by the CVSS Specification.
The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack, but the attack is limited at the protocol level to a logically adjacent topology. This can mean an attack must be launched from the same shared physical (e.g., Bluetooth or IEEE 802.11) or logical (e.g., local IP subnet) network, or from within a secure or otherwise limited administrative domain (e.g., MPLS, secure VPN to an administrative network zone). One example of an Adjacent attack would be an ARP (IPv4) or neighbor discovery (IPv6) flood leading to a denial of service on the local LAN segment (e.g., CVE-2013-6014).
Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component.
The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user.
An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
There is no loss of confidentiality.
There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any or all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.
There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.
NIST
3.9
CVSS SCORE
7.5highDebian
-
CVSS SCORE
N/AlowUbuntu
-