CVE-2026-78677
ADVISORY - githubSummary
- CWE: CWE-73 (External Control of File Name or Path) / CWE-22 (Path Traversal, in the "escapes intended base directory" sense)
- Affected component:
git/repo/base.py,Repo.unsafe_git_clone_options(class attribute, lines 153-165) andRepo._clone()(lines 1477-1520), reached via the publicRepo.clone_from()(line 1626) andRepo.clone()(line 1567) APIs. - Affected version: GitPython at HEAD (
9729ed3b948f2bde09f1f188c5311e172212b67e, 2026-08-05, VERSION3.1.58)
Reachability
Repo.clone_from(url, to_path, **kwargs) (and Repo.clone()) forward arbitrary keyword arguments to the underlying git clone invocation. Before forwarding, GitPython builds a candidate option list from the kwargs (Git._option_candidates) and checks it against a denylist, Repo.unsafe_git_clone_options, via Git.check_unsafe_options() — unless the caller passes allow_unsafe_options=True. This denylist mechanism is exactly the guard that the last ~16 published GHSAs against this repo (2026-07-12 → 2026-08-05) have repeatedly found incomplete or bypassable for other options (--template, --upload-pack, --config, --exec, --output, --index-output, --pathspec-from-file, etc.).
git clone also accepts --separate-git-dir=<path>, which redirects the repository's entire .git metadata directory to an arbitrary, caller-controlled filesystem path, leaving only a gitlink text file (gitdir: <path>) at the intended destination. This is the exact same primitive already recognized as unsafe by GitPython's own code: Repo.unsafe_git_init_options (line 145-150) blocks --separate-git-dir for Repo.init(), with the comment "Redirects the repository metadata to a caller-controlled path". The Repo._clone()/clone()/clone_from() docstring (line 1450-1452) is even more explicit:
:param allow_unsafe_options:
Allow unsafe options to be used, such as ``--template`` and
``--separate-git-dir``.
i.e. the maintainers' own documentation states that allow_unsafe_options=False (the default) is supposed to block --separate-git-dir for clone. But Repo.unsafe_git_clone_options does not contain it:
unsafe_git_clone_options = [
"--upload-pack",
"-u",
"--config",
"-c",
"--template",
"--bundle-uri",
]
So any application that forwards a separate_git_dir (or separate-git-dir) kwarg into Repo.clone_from() / Repo.clone() — e.g. a CI/build service, a Git-hosting proxy, or any tool that exposes a subset of clone options to a client, the exact threat model already accepted for the sibling --template/--upload-pack/--config entries in this same list — gets no protection at all for --separate-git-dir, even with the default allow_unsafe_options=False.
Root cause
Parity gap between two sibling denylists that guard the same underlying primitive (arbitrary redirection of git metadata storage): unsafe_git_init_options correctly lists --separate-git-dir; unsafe_git_clone_options, covering the same option on a different git subcommand that also accepts it, does not — despite the function's own docstring claiming otherwise. This is the same "denylist omits an equally-dangerous sibling option" pattern already responsible for GHSA-539m-9xh6-q6rr (archive denylist missing --add-file/--add-virtual-file) and GHSA-6p8h-3wgx-97gf (clone denylist missing --template, since fixed).
Exploit path
- Attacker-controlled input reaches a
separate_git_dir=...(or equivalently"separate-git-dir") keyword argument passed intoRepo.clone_from()/Repo.clone()by the host application, withallow_unsafe_optionsleft at its defaultFalse. Git._option_candidates()renders this as--separate-git-dirandGit.check_unsafe_options()checks it againstRepo.unsafe_git_clone_options— no match, noUnsafeOptionErrorraised.Git.transform_kwargs()renders the same kwarg into the real command line as--separate-git-dir=<attacker path>and GitPython executesgit clone -v --separate-git-dir=<attacker path> -- <url> <dest>viasubprocess(no shell).gititself creates the full repository metadata tree (config,description,HEAD,hooks/,index,objects/,refs/,packed-refs,logs/) at the attacker-specified path — which can be any path outside the intended clone destination that the process has permission to create — and leaves a gitlink file at the intended destination pointing to it.
Impact
Arbitrary directory/file creation at a path fully controlled by the attacker (bounded only by filesystem permissions of the process running GitPython), matching the impact class of the already-published, High-severity GHSA-hmq2-w58f-27jc ("Arbitrary Git Repository Creation Outside the Working Tree", CVSS 8.2). Concretely:
- Planting a git repository structure (including a
hooks/directory) at an attacker-chosen location outside the sandboxed clone destination the calling application intended to confine the operation to. - If the attacker-chosen path collides with an existing directory the process can write into (e.g. another repository's
.git, a shared cache path, a predictable temp location), the clone silently populates/overwritesconfig,HEAD,hooks/*,refs/*,packed-refs, andindexthere — an integrity violation of a resource outside the intended destination. - Combined with any later operation that runs
gitagainst that redirected/colliding directory (common in CI/build systems that reuse or predict working-directory layouts), this can escalate to hook execution, matching the RCE class already accepted for--templateinGHSA-9rj7-rf2p-w77r.
Preconditions
- The calling application forwards a caller-influenced value into a
separate_git_dirkwarg ofRepo.clone_from()/Repo.clone()(or into themulti_optionslist as a raw--separate-git-dir=...token) without itself validating/rejecting it, and does not passallow_unsafe_options=Trueintentionally. This is the identical trust model GitPython's own denylist already defends for--template/--upload-pack/--config/--bundle-urion the very same code path — i.e. this option was clearly meant to be covered by the same guard and was simply omitted. - No authentication/role requirement inside GitPython itself; the vulnerable code runs the moment the host application calls the API with the option present.
Evidence
git/repo/base.py:145-151—unsafe_git_init_optionsincludes"--separate-git-dir"with the comment "Redirects the repository metadata to a caller-controlled path".git/repo/base.py:153-165—unsafe_git_clone_options(the list actually enforced on_clone) does not include"--separate-git-dir".git/repo/base.py:1450-1452— docstring ofclone_from/cloneexplicitly documents--separate-git-diras one of the optionsallow_unsafe_optionsis supposed to gate.git/repo/base.py:1495-1518—_clone()special-casesseparate_git_dironly toGit.polish_url()it (path normalization for URL-like values), then runs it throughGit.check_unsafe_options(options=..., unsafe_options=cls.unsafe_git_clone_options)— which, per the list above, does not flag it.- PoC (
gitpython-001-poc.py, embedded below) run against this exact checkout confirms the option reaches the realgit clonesubprocess unguarded and creates a full git directory outside the destination path, withallow_unsafe_optionsat its defaultFalse.
False-positive check (adversarial re-read)
- Is there a value-level check that would still stop this? No —
check_unsafe_optionsonly inspects option names (via_canonicalize_option_name) against the denylist; it performs no filesystem/path validation onseparate_git_dir's value, and no other guard in_clone()touches this kwarg besides theGit.polish_url()normalization (which does not reject arbitrary paths). - Is
--separate-git-dirperhaps a no-op or safely sandboxed forclonespecifically (unlikeinit)? No — confirmed empirically: the option reaches the realgitbinary unmodified and git honors it exactly as documented, writing the full metadata tree to the given path. - Could this be the exact bug already covered by one of the 26 published GHSAs? Checked all 26 entries in
_known-advisories.json(Filter 0):GHSA-9rj7-rf2p-w77rcovers--templateinRepo.init;GHSA-6p8h-3wgx-97gfcovers--templatein clone (already fixed, present inunsafe_git_clone_options);GHSA-hmq2-w58f-27jccovers arbitrary repo creation via unvalidated.gitmodulessubmodule names (a different code path —Submodule, notRepo.clone_from()kwargs). None reference--separate-git-diron the clone path. This is a distinct, currently-unpatched gap. - Does this require an unrealistic precondition? The precondition (host app forwards a kwarg into
clone_from/clone) is identical to the precondition already accepted by the maintainers for the sibling entries in the same list (--template,--upload-pack,--config,--bundle-uri) — i.e. it is the same threat model the guard exists to cover, just missing one entry. - Verdict: no concrete blocker found. CONFIRMED.
Remediation
Add "--separate-git-dir" (and its - alias if git ever adds one — currently there is none) to Repo.unsafe_git_clone_options in git/repo/base.py, matching unsafe_git_init_options. Since Repo._clone() already special-cases separate_git_dir for Git.polish_url() normalization, the fix is a one-line addition to the existing list, consistent with how GHSA-6p8h-3wgx-97gf added --template to the same list.
Confidence
High. Root cause is a one-line, unambiguous omission the maintainers' own docstring contradicts; PoC reproduces cleanly and deterministically against the current HEAD; no plausible false-positive path found.
Proof-of-Concept source (gitpython-001-poc.py)
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
GITPYTHON-001 PoC: Repo.clone_from(separate_git_dir=...) is not in
unsafe_git_clone_options, so it reaches `git clone` unguarded and writes a
full git directory (config, hooks/, objects/, refs/, ...) to an
attacker-controlled path OUTSIDE the intended destination directory, with
allow_unsafe_options left at its default of False.
Run against the GitPython source tree under test, e.g.:
PYTHONPATH="<repo>:<repo>/gitdb:<repo>/smmap" python3 gitpython-001-poc.py <workdir>
Benign: only writes/reads inside the given workdir. No destructive/exfiltrating
payload. Exits non-zero and prints "NOT VULNERABLE" if the guard blocks the option
or the write does not escape the destination directory.
"""
import os
import sys
import subprocess
def main():
workdir = sys.argv[1] if len(sys.argv) > 1 else "/tmp/gitpython-001-poc"
src = os.path.join(workdir, "src")
dest = os.path.join(workdir, "dest")
sentinel_dir = os.path.join(workdir, "OUTSIDE_SENTINEL")
target_gitdir = os.path.join(sentinel_dir, "redirected.git")
for p in (src, dest, sentinel_dir):
os.makedirs(p, exist_ok=True)
# Minimal benign source repo to clone from.
subprocess.run(["git", "init", "-q", "-b", "main", src], check=True)
subprocess.run(["git", "-C", src, "config", "user.email", "test@example.com"], check=True)
subprocess.run(["git", "-C", src, "config", "user.name", "Test"], check=True)
with open(os.path.join(src, "file.txt"), "w") as f:
f.write("hello\n")
subprocess.run(["git", "-C", src, "add", "file.txt"], check=True)
subprocess.run(["git", "-C", src, "commit", "-q", "-m", "init"], check=True)
import git # gitpython under test
print("unsafe_git_clone_options =", git.Repo.unsafe_git_clone_options)
assert "--separate-git-dir" not in git.Repo.unsafe_git_clone_options, (
"guard now includes --separate-git-dir; PoC no longer applicable, target patched"
)
try:
repo = git.Repo.clone_from(src, dest, separate_git_dir=target_gitdir)
except git.exc.UnsafeOptionError as e:
print("NOT VULNERABLE: blocked by UnsafeOptionError:", e)
sys.exit(1)
wrote_outside = os.path.isdir(os.path.join(target_gitdir, "hooks")) and os.path.isfile(
os.path.join(target_gitdir, "config")
)
gitlink_points_outside = False
with open(os.path.join(dest, ".git")) as f:
gitlink = f.read().strip()
gitlink_points_outside = target_gitdir in gitlink
print("repo.git_dir =", repo.git_dir)
print("wrote git directory outside dest (sentinel) =", wrote_outside)
print("dest/.git gitlink points outside dest =", gitlink_points_outside)
if wrote_outside and gitlink_points_outside:
print("VULNERABLE: git directory created at attacker-controlled path "
f"outside the clone destination: {target_gitdir}")
sys.exit(0)
else:
print("NOT VULNERABLE: sentinel not observed")
sys.exit(1)
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)
Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
GitHub
CVSS SCORE
8.7high| Package | Type | OS Name | OS Version | Affected Ranges | Fix Versions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| gitpython | pypi | - | - | <=3.1.58 | 3.1.59 |
CVSS:4 Severity and metrics
The CVSS metrics represent different qualitative aspects of a vulnerability that impact the overall score, as defined by the CVSS Specification.
The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack, but the attack is limited at the protocol level to a logically adjacent topology. This can mean an attack must be launched from the same shared physical (e.g., Bluetooth or IEEE 802.11) or logical (e.g., local IP subnet) network, or from within a secure or otherwise limited administrative domain (e.g., MPLS, secure VPN to an administrative network zone). One example of an Adjacent attack would be an ARP (IPv4) or neighbor discovery (IPv6) flood leading to a denial of service on the local LAN segment (e.g., CVE-2013-6014).
Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component.
The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
The attacker is unauthenticated prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker. Examples include: a remote attacker is able to send packets to a target system a locally authenticated attacker executes code to elevate privileges.
There is a total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all information within the Vulnerable System being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact. For example, an attacker steals the administrator's password, or private encryption keys of a web server.
There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
There is no loss of integrity within the Vulnerable System.
There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
NIST
3.9
CVSS SCORE
8.7highAlpine
-
Debian
-
Ubuntu
-
CVSS SCORE
N/AmediumPypA
PYSEC-2026-3787
-
CVSS SCORE
8.7highminimos
MINI-prpc-vph8-v6pw
-