CVE-2026-85061
ADVISORY - githubSummary
Impact
DOM.sanitize() in src/util/dom.ts iterated elem.attributes (a live NamedNodeMap) while calling elem.removeAttribute() in the same loop. Removing an attribute shifts subsequent attributes down by one index, causing the iterator to skip the adjacent attribute.
An attacker can provide an HTML payload with consecutive dangerous attributes (such as <details open onload="1" ontoggle="...">). The first attribute is stripped while the second survives and executes upon insertion into innerHTML via the attribution control without requiring user interaction (zero-click XSS).
Applications rendering untrusted/third-party style attribution strings or user-supplied custom attributions are impacted.
Patches
The issue has been resolved by creating a static snapshot of attributes using Array.from(elem.attributes) before iteration. Please upgrade to maplibre-gl version 6.4.1 (or latest).
Workarounds
Sanitizing the attribute field of a source before passing it down to maplibre
Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
GitHub
3.9
CVSS SCORE
10critical| Package | Type | OS Name | OS Version | Affected Ranges | Fix Versions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| maplibre-gl | npm | - | - | <=6.4.0 | 6.4.1 |
CVSS:3 Severity and metrics
The CVSS metrics represent different qualitative aspects of a vulnerability that impact the overall score, as defined by the CVSS Specification.
The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack, but the attack is limited at the protocol level to a logically adjacent topology. This can mean an attack must be launched from the same shared physical (e.g., Bluetooth or IEEE 802.11) or logical (e.g., local IP subnet) network, or from within a secure or otherwise limited administrative domain (e.g., MPLS, secure VPN to an administrative network zone). One example of an Adjacent attack would be an ARP (IPv4) or neighbor discovery (IPv6) flood leading to a denial of service on the local LAN segment (e.g., CVE-2013-6014).
Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component.
The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user.
An exploited vulnerability can affect resources beyond the security scope managed by the security authority of the vulnerable component. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are different and managed by different security authorities.
There is a total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact. For example, an attacker steals the administrator's password, or private encryption keys of a web server.
There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any or all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.
There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.
NIST
3.9