CVE-2026-59880

Summary

Immutable.Map and Immutable.Set keep keys that share the same 32-bit hash in a collision bucket that is scanned linearly. The string hash is public and deterministic, so an attacker who controls the keys inserted into a Map can craft many keys that all collide, degrading insertion and lookup from amortized O(1) to O(n) per operation — and O(n²) to build or read the whole set. A small, attacker-shaped payload can therefore consume disproportionate CPU and, on a single-threaded runtime such as Node.js, stall the event loop and deny service.

Details

The string hash uses the JVM-style polynomial hashed = (31 * hashed + charCode) | 0. Strings such as "Aa" and "BB" hash to the same value (65*31+97 == 66*31+66 == 2112), and concatenating such blocks yields 2^n distinct strings sharing one hash (40 characters ⇒ >1,000,000 colliding keys). All such keys route to a single HashCollisionNode, whose get/update walk the entire bucket testing is(). There is no per-process salt, so the colliding set is fully precomputable from the open-source algorithm.

Proof of concept

Inserting N colliding keys (e.g. via Immutable.Map(obj) / Immutable.fromJS(obj)) is O(N²). Measured on one machine, ~8,000 colliding keys take ~0.7 s to build and ~0.6 s to read, scaling ×4 per doubling; ~16,000 keys exceed several seconds.

Impact

CPU-bound denial of service in applications that ingest attacker-controlled object keys into Immutable structures, e.g. Immutable.Map(req.body), Immutable.fromJS(req.body), state.merge(userObject) / mergeDeep(...). Applications that only store attacker input as values under fixed keys are not affected.

Affected versions

All versions through 5.1.7 (the deterministic string hash and linear collision bucket have existed since the 4.x line).

Patches

Fixed in 5.1.8 (adjust to the actual release): large collision buckets are indexed by a per-process seeded secondary hash, restoring near-linear behavior for the affected paths. The public hash() is unchanged (no breaking change), and is() remains the sole authority on key equality.

Workarounds

Before passing untrusted data to Immutable.js: cap request body size, limit object key count/length, and reject high-cardinality payloads; avoid building Maps directly from untrusted object keys.

References

• CWE-407 (Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity), CWE-400 (Uncontrolled Resource Consumption)
• OWASP API4:2023 (Unrestricted Resource Consumption)